Re: Should gwt-dev.jar be on classpath on webmode?

2011-07-01 Thread Magno Machado
Using GWT 2.3 This is the Guice stuff that I added to my web.xml filter filter-nameguiceFilter/filter-name filter-classcom.google.inject.servlet.GuiceFilter/filter-class /filter filter-mapping filter-nameguiceFilter/filter-name url-pattern/*/url-pattern /filter-mapping

Re: Should gwt-dev.jar be on classpath on webmode?

2011-07-01 Thread David Chandler
Make sure you have only one GWT version on your classpath. The gwt/dev/asm classes are in gwt-servlet.jar, which should be the only GWT jar you need on the server side (along with validation-api.jar and json.jar). Also, in order to get the benefits of Guice injection for RF services, you'll need

Re: Should gwt-dev.jar be on classpath on webmode?

2011-07-01 Thread Magno Machado
Actualy I already have Guice injection on RF services and I didn't had to subclass RFS nor work with service layer decorators... well, at least in devmode it works On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Chandler drfibona...@google.comwrote: Make sure you have only one GWT version on your

Re: Should gwt-dev.jar be on classpath on webmode?

2011-07-01 Thread Magno Machado
Thank you, David, the problem was that I wasnt using gwt-servlet at all On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Magno Machado magn...@gmail.com wrote: Actualy I already have Guice injection on RF services and I didn't had to subclass RFS nor work with service layer decorators... well, at least in

Should gwt-dev.jar be on classpath on webmode?

2011-06-30 Thread Magno Machado
This is what I get if I don't put it on classpath: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/google/gwt/dev/asm/commons/Method at com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.server.ResolverServiceLayer.clinit(ResolverServiceLayer.java:46) at

Re: Should gwt-dev.jar be on classpath on webmode?

2011-06-30 Thread David Chandler
Which version of GWT? You shouldn't need gwt-dev.jar to run RequestFactoryServlet. Can you share your Guice config? Are you passing any params to RFS? On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Magno Machado magn...@gmail.com wrote: This is what I get if I don't put it on classpath: