On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Joel Webber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a pretty tricky expression -- my understanding of how it works is
that (maybe_float_value | 0) coerces to an integer because the | operator
requires its operands to be integral. This seems like a perfectly good
This is a pretty tricky expression -- my understanding of how it works is
that (maybe_float_value | 0) coerces to an integer because the | operator
requires its operands to be integral. This seems like a perfectly good
approach, but I would add a comment explaining how it works (because I've
seen
Running RPCSuite, it looks like everything passes except for
UnicodeEscapingTest.testClientToServer[Non]BMP(), which cause the exceptions
described below, on the server.
I'll keep looking over the patch; feel free to swing by if you want to look
over the failure together on the Android emulator.
Could someone with OOPHM experience review this design doc about
adding hosted-mode support for AIR applications, based on OOPHM:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-in-the-air/wiki/DesignOOPHM
Adobe AIR knowledge is obviously a plus, but I think isn't required to
understand the document. Anyway,
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Oct 13 09:50:46 2008
New Revision: 3741
Removed:
releases/1.6/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/cfg/DefaultPropertyProvider.java
Modified:
releases/1.6/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/Artifact.java
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:40 AM, John Tamplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lex, do you know what we would need to do to get these exceptions
seirialized properly to the client?
I *think* what needs to happen is that the exception is wrapped in a
declared exception. I haven't checked, but the
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Oct 13 12:30:58 2008
New Revision: 3742
Modified:
releases/1.5/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/MethodInliner.java
releases/1.5/user/test/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/test/CompilerTest.java
Log:
Uses a more reliable check to prevent methods with
Hi John and Scott,
Attached is a patch to fix the issue. The previous code was failing because
it was invoking Integer.decode(..) method to do the parsing.
Integer.decode(..) first tries to infer the base and then attempts to decode
the String in that base. 08 and 09 were decoded as octal and an
Hi Miguel,
I would like for you to review the attached patch. We discussed them
earlier as a part of the WorkerPool demo.
It adds support for message types other than string.
M gears/test/com/google/gwt/gears/client/workerpool/WorkerPoolTest.java
M
I don't have any OOPHM experience, but IIRC, linkers don't run in
hosted mode (or do they now?), so the last part of your design doc may
need revising.
-Ray
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone with OOPHM experience review this design doc
Could you add this patch to the issue and use a filename like
Time_valueOf.patch.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Amit Manjhi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John and Scott,
Attached is a patch to fix the issue. The previous code was failing because
it was invoking Integer.decode(..) method to
Done. I also added appropriate tests and have attached the updated patch.
The patch has been reviewed by John Tamplin. Since the patch is simple, both
he and I think this patch is safe to go in 1_5_3.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Amit
Index: user/test/com/google/gwt/emultest/java/sql/SqlTimeTest.java
On 13 oct, 21:50, Ray Cromwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have any OOPHM experience, but IIRC, linkers don't run in
hosted mode (or do they now?),
They don't.
so the last part of your design doc may
need revising.
Actually, it might rather be my neural compiler producing bad
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Amit Manjhi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done. I also added appropriate tests and have attached the updated patch.
The patch has been reviewed by John Tamplin. Since the patch is simple, both
he and I think this patch is safe to go in 1_5_3.
Thoughts?
No
By the way, we're talking about a redesign where linkers do run in hosted
mode. The idea is an initial link over public files + a mocked up
CompilationResult with no javascript that encodes the deferred binding
props, followed by incremental relinks when generators produce resources.
On Mon, Oct
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Oct 13 17:38:49 2008
New Revision: 3745
Added:
branches/oophm/plugins/xpcom/prebuilt/extension/platform/Darwin_x86-gcc3/
branches/oophm/plugins/xpcom/prebuilt/extension/platform/Darwin_x86-gcc3/components/
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Oct 13 17:44:04 2008
New Revision: 3746
Added:
branches/oophm/plugins/xpcom/prebuilt/oophm-xpcom.xpi (contents, props
changed)
Log:
Add prebuilt XPI containing the following XPCOM plugins for Firefox 3:
Windows x86
Linux x86
Linux x86_64
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Oct 13 17:46:40 2008
New Revision: 3747
Modified:
branches/oophm/plugins/xpcom/prebuilt/oophm-xpcom.xpi (props changed)
Log:
Set MIME type so XPI file can be installed.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
FF3 winxp on OOPHM rev 3747 branch fails with No GWT plugin found
hosted.html trys to find plugin but fails with an alert No GWT plugin
found
The plugin (oophm.xpi) was correctly installed.
The IE plugin was also registered and IE seems to work fine.
Any workaround or solution?
Cheers,
Grant
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Scott Blum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, I've already got a big patch out that Bob is reviewing that
is a
huge refactor to JavaToJavaScriptCompiler, and we can continue to
refactor
further to support this use case in the best way possible. I can't
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 9:51 PM, gslender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FF3 winxp on OOPHM rev 3747 branch fails with No GWT plugin found
hosted.html trys to find plugin but fails with an alert No GWT plugin
found
Given the current plugin initialization, hosted.html can't tell a missing
plugin
21 matches
Mail list logo
