On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:48 AM, gslender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re the warning - loading both plugins fixes the warning. I don't get
it anymore.
Right, since Firefox thinks it has a plugin to match the embed tag, even
though hosted.html will never use it because it finds the XPCOM plugin
Hi,
I added a TabPanel to the hello world example, with a tab for each
example. I added an example for the new DataView.
Thanks,
Uwe
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Rajeev / Alex -
Can you summarize what the problem with RequestBuilder and RPC? I don't see
an issue associated with the fix, and it would be good to use something more
descriptive than it was broke.
Here is the commit log:
For IE7, we should be instantiating an XHR with the native
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Rajeev Dayal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time.valueOf no longer tries to determine radix values...
Instead of mentioning the radix problem, say that Time.valueOf correctly
parses values with leading zeros
Well, it would incorrectly accept 0xc:0xF:0x25 before,
Hi,
I added the new DataView class that allows read only access to a
DataTable for selected columns.
Thanks,
Uwe
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Index:
Please review this change for 1.5.3 which fixes a number of small issues.
The patch is larger than you might expect because it includes parts copied
from elsewhere (and then simplified) for choosing what characters to quote
and how to quote them, but at this point I felt it was safer to copy them
We'd gotten a report that for some IEs, when you instantiate the XHR
with new ActiveXObject(Microsoft.XMLHTTP), if you try to do a GET
with that object, it does a POST. This patch fixed that problem by
using a different string (or just the native XMLlHttpRequest object).
I was able to reproduce
1st issue
I am interested in looking at the code that handles errors coming back
from an XmlHttpRequest. After checkout, where would I look for this?
Basically, in seam using AJAX, if the response to an XmlHttpRequest is
a redirect message, the entire page redirects. I kinda wanted the
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Oct 14 11:51:17 2008
New Revision: 3752
Modified:
releases/1.5/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/impl/AbstractSerializationStream.java
releases/1.5/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/impl/ClientSerializationStreamWriter.java
I don't think anything I did merits explicit release notes call out; let's
remember to include a query link for all fixed issues.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM. All the tests seem to work properly on the emulator. Would you mind
entering an issue to come back and loosen up the escaping regex, once the
Android encoding bug gets fixed?
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:37 AM, John Tamplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Joel
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Joel Webber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LGTM. All the tests seem to work properly on the emulator. Would you mind
entering an issue to come back and loosen up the escaping regex, once the
Android encoding bug gets fixed?
Committed to releases/1.5 at r3752, issue
Alright, taking a look!
The code looks good (one typographical nit), but I'm pretty sure you
should change the comments in the tests that reference local files on
your machine. Also, all the test files should have copyright notices
(don't they?), but it looks like you took some of them out.
Let
Kathrin and I reviewed this together.
In general, this solves an important use case, so let's move forward
on it aside from minor issues.
The following use cases are the ones we could think of:
- Seeing what amount of output code (and in fact the actual code if you
want) corresponds to what
HTTPRequests no long POST instead of GET in some IE installs because of
incorrect XHR selection
should be
HTTPRequests no longer POST instead of GET in some IE installs because of
incorrect XHR selection
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:20 PM, John LaBanca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright, please
Alright, please take a final look at the changes you all recommended and
give a LGTM if the release notes look good.
http://www.corp.google.com/~jlabanca/release_notes.htmlhttp://www.corp.google.com/%7Ejlabanca/release_notes.html
Thanks,
John LaBanca
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at
Just formatting nitpicks.1) All code needs to use the HTML for code.
2) Any code that refers to a method should be postfixed with parentheses.
See the formatting in 1.5.2 notes.
Specifically:
HTTPRequests - make singular to match class name, use code style
getAbsoluteTop/Left -
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Alex Rudnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The code looks good (one typographical nit), but I'm pretty sure you
should change the comments in the tests that reference local files on
your machine. Also, all the test files should have copyright notices
(don't they?),
Comments below...
On Oct 14, 6:25 pm, John Tamplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you reproduce this with the samples? Say, run Hello-shell then refresh
the page? For me, it shows the old one disconnected and creates a new
connection, as expected. Where do you get the out of bounds
Hey Eric :) I'll take this one.
LGTM, save the (formatting) comments below and a question about documentation.
gears/test/com/google/gwt/gears/client/workerpool/WorkerPoolTest.java:
388: Should probably take out the commented-out
testReceiveMessageObject. Unless you wanted to put this one in?
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Joel Webber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running RPCSuite, it looks like everything passes except for
UnicodeEscapingTest.testClientToServer[Non]BMP(), which cause the exceptions
described below, on the server.
Ok, here is a revised patch, which adds quoting for
So is there any way to find out where/what is really causing this
array IndexOutOfBoundsException ??
It must be the JS parser within GWT I'm guessing?
Cheers,
Grant
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Thanks for the comments.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Alex Rudnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Eric :) I'll take this one.
LGTM, save the (formatting) comments below and a question about documentation.
gears/test/com/google/gwt/gears/client/workerpool/WorkerPoolTest.java:
388: Should
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:30 PM, gslender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So is there any way to find out where/what is really causing this
array IndexOutOfBoundsException ??
It must be the JS parser within GWT I'm guessing?
java.util.ArrayList.get(Unknown Source) at
Hi all,
I have attached a patch for TreeMap Serialization. The patch has been
reviewed by John Tamplin. Most of the code is similar to the way we do
serialization/deserialization for HashMap. The deserialization is done
element by element and the tree is being built incrementally. John pointed
I realize I may be jumping in late to this discussion, but Bruce just
introduced me to this fine contributors group. At a talk during the
Google I/O conference, I mentioned the benefit of using the GWT
FastStringMap implementation over the HashMap implementation and I
decided to re-run my
You are teh w00t!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Would it be correct to summarize the chief blocking issue as needing
to reconsider the equals / compareTo / hashCode functions on
SourceInfo and Correlation?
--
Bob Vawter
Google Web Toolkit Team
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Joel,
I know you're just dying to revisit the coordinate system cleanups from
r3364.
That opportunity now exists as issue 2981 :)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2981
RootPanel.add(widget, 0, 0) with 1px border results in static positioning in
IE quirks
Fred
29 matches
Mail list logo
