Hi,
Oooh it's great ! It works well. Now I can debug and use firebug in
the same time !
Can you confirm me that the trunk will be used for the 1.6 M2 ?
(It seems the 1.6 M1 does not contains the gwt-*oophm jar).
Note: During the compilation of GWT, there are lot of logs indicating
problem of
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Sebastien chassa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Oooh it's great ! It works well. Now I can debug and use firebug in
the same time !
Can you confirm me that the trunk will be used for the 1.6 M2 ?
(It seems the 1.6 M1 does not contains the gwt-*oophm jar).
As
It's not quite a bug, but I agree it is odd. Basically, it would be nice if
CustomeSerializers could declare additional types. Since they can't, one
solution is to add that type to class A. Just add a dummy field:
/**
* Force B to be serializable.
*/
private final B serializeElement = null;
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob, you are awesome. I'm excited this went from design to
implementation so quickly, since it solves a lot of headache in my
current codebase. I only wish it made it into 1.6. :)
s/Bob/GWT team/
Thanks Ray. I'm sure
I would like to do a brief case study or two on how code splitting is
working in practice. Studying Showcase has already been helpful, but
Showcase might or might not be a typical application.
Is anyone trying code splitting on an open-source project that would
be willing to have your app's
(2) sounds reasonable. But, what are the consequences of disallowing (1)?
Would it mean that anonymous classes can no longer have jsni code?
Amit
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:41 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
Some of
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
Just out of curiousity, how does one reference an anonymous inner
class from JSNI (or do you mean Local classes?) Since it has no
concrete type name, the only thing I can think of referencing it via a
Yeah, I agree with Ray - that's just plain crazy (and brittle). :) I
can't think of any way you'd get into that, even if you were auto-
generating code. Considering that anonymous classes don't have any
static type literals that you could pass into GWT.create(), I'd say
this is a pretty
I haven't tried it yet, but I will be doing it soon to the Showcase at
http://timefire.com/showcase. It's 150k OBF+gzip, ~400-500k OBF, and
1+M PRETTY. Takes about 2-3 seconds to load, which I want to get down
below 1 second. I've been thinking of two strategies for doing this,
since there are
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Mastracci matt...@mastracci.comwrote:
Yeah, I agree with Ray - that's just plain crazy (and brittle). :) I
can't think of any way you'd get into that, even if you were auto-
generating code. Considering that anonymous classes don't have any
static
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Wed Feb 11 12:55:00 2009
New Revision: 4693
Modified:
releases/1.6/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/jetty/JettyLauncher.java
Log:
Typo fix.
Modified:
releases/1.6/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/jetty/JettyLauncher.java
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Wed Feb 11 13:51:00 2009
New Revision: 4696
Added:
wiki/CodeSplitting.wiki
Log:
Added a code-splitting user manual to the wiki.
Added: wiki/CodeSplitting.wiki
==
--- (empty file)
+++
At long last, I have started a wiki page on how to use GWT.runAsync.
It covers the basics, how to use SOYC to iterate to something better,
and a couple of recommended coding patterns.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/CodeSplitting
Thoughts welcome. Or, gee, it's a wiki. Just
On 11-Feb-09, at 1:58 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
Well, we have tests that verify it and I think I have seen it once
in the wild, but I agree it is pretty worthless and trying to
support it complicates our life significantly.
For the TypeOracle case, the main thing I worry about is
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Wed Feb 11 14:53:37 2009
New Revision: 4697
Modified:
trunk/ (props changed)
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/FragmentLoaderCreator.java
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/GWT.java
Did you update branch-info.txt to avoid merging this back to trunk?
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:12 PM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Wed Feb 11 13:04:43 2009
New Revision: 4695
Removed:
Matthew is correct, anonymous classes (and actually, local classes in
general) are barred from participating in serialization. I think it would
be cleaner just to remove them from TypeOracle altogether... they are an
implementation detail if you will.
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Wed Feb 11 14:55:57 2009
New Revision: 4698
Modified:
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/FragmentLoaderCreator.java
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/AsyncFragmentLoader.java
Log:
Fixes issue 3277. The lightweight metrics for runAsync()
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Wed Feb 11 15:04:54 2009
New Revision: 4699
Removed:
changes/spoon/pending/
Log:
Removes an unneeded changes branch.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
19 matches
Mail list logo
