You could always change the signiture of GWT.runAsync to include a String
parameter as the first parameter. I must be a literal in code, and would be
optimized out / ignored by the compiler :
GWT.runAsync("foo", new RunAsyncCallback() {
Cam
2009/6/20 Lex Spoon
>
> There are multiple reas
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Ian Petersen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>> My worry about Ian's proposal is
>> that method overloading complicate things
>
> Excellent point--wasn't thinking about overloads.
Now that I've had more time to think, my RunAsyncRef
I've been working to improve load behavior of a very large application with
a few dozen
runAsync calls, and for Javadoc clarity I've been putting each call in
its own method
anyway -- found this very useful to track the purpose and timing of each
split, and document any known implications. So in p
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Fri Jun 19 10:32:43 2009
New Revision: 5593
Modified:
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/SymbolData.java
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/impl/StandardSymbolData.java
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/Generat
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Fri Jun 19 09:06:11 2009
New Revision: 5590
Added:
trunk/user/test/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/InitialLoadSequence.gwt.xml
(contents, props changed)
trunk/user/test/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/test/InitialLoadSequenceTest.java
(contents, props changed)
Modif
On 2009/06/19 01:37:23, scottb wrote:
LGTM. Good catches, all.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/42802
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Fri Jun 19 10:07:55 2009
New Revision: 5591
Added:
branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/user/test/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/InitialLoadSequence.gwt.xml
- copied unchanged from r5590,
/trunk/user/test/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/InitialLoadSequence.gwt.xml
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Fri Jun 19 10:11:21 2009
New Revision: 5592
Modified:
branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/branch-info.txt
Log:
Update branch-info.txt to reflect r5591.
Modified: branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/branch-info.txt
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> My worry about Ian's proposal is
> that method overloading complicate things
Excellent point--wasn't thinking about overloads. I think your
solution might be more elegant--it seems easier to explain,
understand, and enforce "must sub-interf
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Fri Jun 19 08:41:08 2009
New Revision: 5589
Modified:
wiki/CssResource.wiki
Log:
Edited wiki page through web user interface.
Modified: wiki/CssResource.wiki
==
--- wiki/CssResource.wik
LGTM. That will be helpful information to have in the symbol maps.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/41802
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
A slight tweak to what Ian said: What if we got this effect by simpy
requiring you to use interfaces that extend
AsyncCallback as a way to reify split points?
interface EmailCompositionView extends AsyncCallback {
...
}
Then you definitely have a fully-qualified name for a split point if you
ne
Committed at r5590.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/43802
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/43802/diff/1/4
File user/test/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/InitialLoadSequence.gwt.xml
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/43802/diff/1/4#newcode2
Line 2:
On 2009/06/19 02:23:12, bobv wrote:
> 2009
Done.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/43802/diff/1/3
Reviewers: Lex, scottb,
Message:
Requesting review
Description:
This change adds an additional method to the linker SymbolData API to
export typeids. This data will be used by the derpc code.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/41802
Affected files:
M dev/core/src/com
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Lex Spoon wrote:
> This looks like a straightforward and easily understood way to name
> calls to runAsync. What do others think?
As a brainstorm-quality idea, what about requiring that runAsync
invocations are in their own methods (as you mentioned) but not
requ
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Lex Spoon wrote:
> The main tradeoffs I see are that the files version integrates well
> with existing tools and IDEs. No matter what build tool you use, you
> should be able to get a fast incremental build by using the files
> version. On the flip side, for peop
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
> Would it not be possible to store the Unified/Precompiled/Unoptimized
> AST to disk and then you'd only have to JDT-reparse any classes that
> changed? Or use, was it Toby?'s, old idea of tunneling compiler
> information in .class files on di
There are multiple reasons that people end up wanting a way to name
calls to runAsync. One of them is the specification of an initial
load sequence that I just implemented. Looking ahead, they would be
useful for prefetch requests. It's hard to say "download fragment Foo
if you can", if you don
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:59 AM, noon wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This thread follows this one (http://groups.google.com/group/Google-
> Web-Toolkit-Contributors/msg/582cfe33f17deab3), so please read it
> before this one.
>
> To make Google App Engine and GWT work together (in adapter4appengine
> proje
By the way, in case it's not obvious, having Map.put() return the old
value is usually good for performance. Without it, coders must
sometimes do a query of the map followed by a put, which means that
the same key is looked up twice.
To contrast, returning a value that is at hand but is not actu
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Matt Mastracci wrote:
> Yeah... I would love to have a single AST to represent both of the
> language states - many optimizations don't happen because we toss all
> the Java type info during the conversion to JS.
>
> For instance, you can't safely optimize this:
Comment by daniel.florey:
In @sprite example you have to replace class with interface
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/CssResource
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--
23 matches
Mail list logo
