Hi all,
I did similar development with Gilead adapter for GAE (available on
Gilead site : http://gilead.sourceforge.net), so I guess it would be a
good idea to share our knwoledge about it.
I modified nearly the same files, but I more generic concepts
(ISerializationFilter and
Hi Lex,
The main problem comes from enhancement added fields, so user can add
@GwtTransient annotation on it.
Yes, enhancement is evil, but we have to do with them...
Regards
Bruno
On 19 juin, 17:09, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:59 AM,
That's fairly closely related to the approach I'm taking. It is worth
noting, however, that this totally fails on IE6, because it won't handle the
kinds of implicit constraints created by, e.g., { left:0; right:0; }. Just
to make matters more difficult, it also can't handle { right:0; }
properly
I think this is a great idea, especially because it can be offered side by
side with the existing SOYC (that includes partial blame assignment). I
agree with you, Lex, that explaining partial blame assignment has been a
challenge. What I am still trying to understand is exactly how blame is
Please extract the expando work to the gwt.core.client package and add
test cases for it, as it's a generally-useful facility to offer.
Needs tests of the JDO testcases.
@Cromwellian,
The expando field just reserves a bit of the Object-field namespace
since it's lazily initialized.
Ping
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/46802
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Ping
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/46801
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Comment by kojot...@gmail.com:
@dan.kozlowski I've followed your steps and it worked like a charm :)
thanks a lot.
My system: openSUSE 11.1 64bit + FF 3.5rc3 64bit + Sun JVM 1.6 64bit +
eclipse 3.4 + GWT trunk (with oophm enabled)
For more information:
Reviewers: jgw,
Description:
Description:
===
Using almost any method in the Basic or Extended formatter when the
RichTextArea is detached results in a JS exception on all browsers.
Even after it is attached, a JS exception occurs in some browsers if the
area is not initialized or if it
FWIW, Dan Rice has also been working on this, if you hadn't seen his review
thread from Friday.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:14 AM, bruno bruno.marches...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lex,
The main problem comes from enhancement added fields, so user can add
@GwtTransient annotation on it.
Yes,
Reviewers: Lex,
Description:
This patch creates a manifest file for each compilation permutation if
the compilation is SOYC enabled. The manifest files are stored
alongside other SOYC manifests (in the soycReport directory).
Each manifest file contains all non-gwt properties for the
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/47807/diff/1/9
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/WeakMapping.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/47807/diff/1/9#newcode31
Line 31: public static Object get(Object instance, String key) {
I'm not sure what can be said about the
Reviewers: jgw,
Description:
Description:
===
In Firefox, the text caret always appears at the begining of the
RichTextArea when the user clicks the first time, regardless of where in
the RichTextArea the user clicked.
The problem is that we set design mode on focus in Mozilla, which
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:19 AM, John Tamplinj...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote:
I've been trying to think of ways to speed up the -soyc option, and
here is the result of one attempt. What do people think?
The idea is to mimick some
Another piece of feedback on the incubator paging scroll table...
I've got a case where I need to programmatically change the value in
some cells (based on other input from the user).
However, since the method used as the cell editor's callback is an
anonymous, inline inner class, I have to
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/47807/diff/1/9
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/WeakMapping.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/47807/diff/1/9#newcode31
Line 31: public static Object get(Object instance, String key) {
On 2009/06/29 15:34:02, Dan Rice wrote:
I'm
On 2009/06/29 15:08:27, jlabanca wrote:
LGTM.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/49801
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Mon Jun 29 10:31:37 2009
New Revision: 5636
Modified:
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/impl/RichTextAreaImplMozilla.java
Log:
Fixes an issue with a missing text caret in the RichTextArea in FF.
Patch by: jlabanca
Review by: jgw
Issue: 1441
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Mon Jun 29 10:34:10 2009
New Revision: 5637
Modified:
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RichTextArea.java
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/impl/RichTextAreaImplIE6.java
LGTM, with comment.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/46802/diff/1/3
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/ReplaceRebinds.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/46802/diff/1/3#newcode95
Line 95: // Proper JSNI ref
Shouldn't most of this lookup logic be duplicated elsewhere
Reviewers: jgw,
Description:
Most of RichTextAreaImplSafari was written to support older versions of
Safari, which we know longer need to support. I've stripped away all of
the old stuff, leaving only a few Safari specific implementations.
This patch also fixes issue 2813 by removing some
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Mon Jun 29 13:22:41 2009
New Revision: 5638
Modified:
trunk/user/test/com/google/gwt/emultest/java/sql/SqlTimestampTest.java
Log:
Fixed a broken test that would fail 0.1% of the time because it assumes
that a Date has a non-zero millsecond field.
Patch
Hi Lex,
all of what you say makes sense to me. I think SoyLite is a great idea and
we should go ahead with it.
I do have one concern, however: as you mention below, some methods will
simply appear to disappear under SoyLite. For instance, in your first
example, Point.getX() will not appear to
LGTM.
Ideally, the similar information in the symbol maps files could be
reused. However, this patch certainly does the job as is. It's up to
you.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/50801
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Bob,
I would like to use a string constant in an @def.
Would you be open to a patch that added a new Method annotation to
distinguish this type of accessor from a class name?
--
Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
Sorry, a little more context, I'm talking about the CssResource class.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Eric Ayerszun...@google.com wrote:
Bob,
I would like to use a string constant in an @def.
Would you be open to a patch that added a new Method annotation to
distinguish this type of
Thanks, Lex.
I've uploaded another patch for your review that addresses your comment.
I'm still not quite certain which way is better - what do people think?
Option 1: Create a manifest file for each permutation which carries the same
permutation id as the existing SOYC report files.
Good: Can
I’m having a strange issue with trunk and IE8 where the browser’s
history stack inexplicably “disappears”. That is, the history drop
down list empties (including previously visited non-GWT sites, like
MSN) and the back/forward buttons don’t work. My guess is that this is
a bug in IE8 that GWT is
Scott,
IIRC, you were most recently working on GWTTestCase changes.
I just filed this issue which is throwing gwt-log users trying to use
GWTTestCase:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3791
I hoping the described behavior is not as designed.
Thanks
--
Fred Sauer
29 matches
Mail list logo
