[gwt-contrib] Comment on LayoutDesign in google-web-toolkit

2009-09-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by oleksandr.berezianskyi: hi, awesome thing! how, were and when can we try it? For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/LayoutDesign --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-09-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by cromwellian: Am I missing something? Is there supposed to be a Compile button in the OOPHM Swing UI? For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[gwt-contrib] Comment on LayoutDesign in google-web-toolkit

2009-09-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by t.broyer: How: compiling GWT Where: from trunk When: right now! ...or you can wait for the 2.0 Milestone 1 release (someone has an estimate for the release date?) For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/LayoutDesign

[gwt-contrib] Comment on OophmForMacBasedGwtContributors in google-web-toolkit

2009-09-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by moni...@gmail.com: I just upgraded my Mac to Snow Leopard and faced the dreaded Java 1.5 vs GWT issue. There is of course no Java 5 on Snow Leopard. I am going to setup my Eclipse 3.5 and GWT 1.7 (which comes with its own distribution of GWT jar files in the plugin) so the

[gwt-contrib] Comment on OophmForMacBasedGwtContributors in google-web-toolkit

2009-09-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by moni...@gmail.com: Here are instructions for Eclipse 3.5, with Google Plugin version 1.1 (which comes with it own distribution of GWT) on Snow Leopard, using Firefox 3.5. 1. Checkout and build GWT code according to instructions posted here (run just dist-dev goal):

[gwt-contrib] Increase timeouts of ClippedImagePrototypeTest

2009-09-04 Thread jlabanca
Reviewers: fabbott, Description: ClippedImagePrototypeTest#testApplyToClippedImage sporadically fails to load the second image, possibly because it times out too quickly. This patch increases the timeout a little. Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/64806 Affected files:

[gwt-contrib] Fix bad delayTestFinish() pattern in JsonpRequestTest

2009-09-04 Thread jlabanca
Reviewers: fabbott, Description: JsonpRequestTest calls delayTestFinish() after its asynchronous RPC calls, which sometimes results in unexpected failures. Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/64807 Affected files:

[gwt-contrib] Re: New API proposal: BatchedCommand

2009-09-04 Thread Bruce Johnson
I'm definitely not a Java pedant, so maybe there's something wrong/underinformed with my perspective here, but here's my take... 1) Why Runnable isn't quite right - Has close associations with threads - Isn't spec'd to throw Throwable, which means what could be simple callbaks have to always have

[gwt-contrib] Re: New API proposal: BatchedCommand

2009-09-04 Thread Ray Ryan
I like the Finally name. Since you have a single Command object used by Incremental along with everyone else, you're implying interface Command { /** * @return whether this command should be run again. * Checked only by {...@link IncrementalCommands} and {...@link TimedCommands} */

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r6089 committed - Remove icons, add short text names for browser tabs in Swing UI....

2009-09-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 6089 Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Sep 4 12:23:59 2009 Log: Remove icons, add short text names for browser tabs in Swing UI. Patch by: jat Review by: jgw (desk) http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6089 Deleted:

[gwt-contrib] Re: New API proposal: BatchedCommand

2009-09-04 Thread Ray Ryan
Because the dispatcher methods are not static you can write your code to have the dispatcher injected, and at test time provide whatever alternative implementation you want. So long as you don't use the static get method outside of your Gin module or whatever, you're golden. Not good enough? On

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r6090 committed - Increasing the timeout of JsonpRequestTest and forcing the server to f...

2009-09-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 6090 Author: jlaba...@google.com Date: Fri Sep 4 13:10:40 2009 Log: Increasing the timeout of JsonpRequestTest and forcing the server to flush results faster. Patch by: jlabanca Review by: jat (desk) http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6090 Modified:

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r6091 committed - Previous DLL was built in debug mode, this one is release.

2009-09-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 6091 Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Sep 4 14:11:29 2009 Log: Previous DLL was built in debug mode, this one is release. http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6091 Modified: /changes/jat/plugins/plugins/ie/prebuilt/oophm.dll

[gwt-contrib] Re: Snow Leopard 32-bit checking fix (1.7 based)

2009-09-04 Thread jat
LGTM with nits. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/64805/diff/1015/1018 File dev/linux/src/com/google/gwt/dev/BootStrapPlatform.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/64805/diff/1015/1018#newcode41 Line 41: System.err.println(You must use a 32-bit runtime to use GWT Hosted Mode on

[gwt-contrib] Initial implementations of Stack and Split layout panels, along with a few checkstyle tweaks.

2009-09-04 Thread jgw
Reviewers: Ray Ryan, Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/65804 Affected files: A user/javadoc/com/google/gwt/examples/SplitLayoutPanelExample.java A user/javadoc/com/google/gwt/examples/StackLayoutPanelExample.java M

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r6093 committed - Brought NPAPI plugin up to current specs for the common code, built an...

2009-09-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 6093 Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Sep 4 16:37:06 2009 Log: Brought NPAPI plugin up to current specs for the common code, built and installed in Chrome. Mostly works, but doesn't respond to button clicks. Patch by: jat Unreviewed

[gwt-contrib] Re: New API proposal: BatchedCommand

2009-09-04 Thread Eric Ayers
-1 for renaming and deprecating the DeferredCommand, etc calls unless there is really something significant other than the name change. As a maintainer, I get sick of APIs moving around underneath my code and having someone else tell me its broken. Furthermore, you'll make obsolete every good