On 2009/12/15 02:02:01, jat wrote:
John, I assume this is a diagnostic tool for catching obscure bugs
(like, find where is the world I'm overflowing and not realizing it).
One idea that comes to mind is, are there any other JLS checks we should
be doing so maybe a more general flag could be
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126801/diff/1/5
File
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/OverflowDetectionNormalizer.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126801/diff/1/5#newcode55
Line 55:
Should we care about JSOs returning values which are already overflowed?
e.g. byte
What is the motivation for this change?
--
Bob Vawter
Google Web Toolkit Team
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Comment by IFa.brainpower:
oops:
2. GWT for Gadgets
(...) or shared work between this project and the Googel for Firefox
Extensions project.
google for firefox
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/GWT_GSoC
--
Hi all,
[long intro, sorry, you can skip to interesting bits start here if
you want]
SpeedTracer tells me that in rendering a list of results
(JsArrayEmployee returned by a RequestBuilder as JSON, displayed in
a Grid widget; no other widgets involved), Chrome is spending 57.2% of
its time, i.e.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:24 AM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
What is the motivation for this change?
short foo = 32767;
foo++;
will behave differently in dev mode and prod mode. In prod mode, foo will
now have the impossible value of 32768, while in dev mode it will be -1.
GWT does not
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 AM, cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
John, I assume this is a diagnostic tool for catching obscure bugs
(like, find where is the world I'm overflowing and not realizing it).
Correct.
One idea that comes to mind is, are there any other JLS checks we should
be
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:00 AM, cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126801/diff/1/5
File
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/OverflowDetectionNormalizer.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126801/diff/1/5#newcode55
Line 55:
Should we care
This needs to be its own thread, but heads up: flags that affect compiler
output (other than -draftCompile) need to become deferred binding properties
so that we can have per-perm flags. Then, we can produce standard sets of
module flags such as Release and Debug that would make easy to activate
Ok, I just realized a serious problem with this patch. When compiling a
more complicated program, multiple optimization passes will be
performed, and this will keep wrapping the expressions each time
through.
I guess I need to visit method calls and if I see an Overflow.check*
call, I need to
No, you're good. The normalization passes only happen once. Just
make sure your transforms don't react with any of the other
normalization passes, such as the long emulation.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126801
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I must have completely missed that feature in the documentation. I
gave that a try, and I have to say I am impressed! I was even able to
use java.lang.String as the provided type!
Combined with the ability to use different ui.xml templates documented
here:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:29 AM, jarrod jarrod.carl...@gmail.com wrote:
Combined with the ability to use different ui.xml templates documented
here:
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiBinder.html#Apply_different_xml
I should be able to declare one ui.xml for IE and
Thanks, Balaji. Ray and/or Bob, want to take a look at this?
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Balaji Srinivasan
srinivas...@google.comwrote:
Hi Folks
I filed issue
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4327
and attached a patch to it to make InterfaceGenerator generate
Actually, I was just struggling with this a bit... I have my two
ui.xml templates setup, but I can't seem to get GWT.create() to select
the right one. Here's what I tried:
@UiTemplate(JavaApplet.ui.xml)
interface JavaApplet extends UiBinderElement, UploaderWidget {
}
Comment by monish.ar:
Using development mode in Eclipse 3.5 using GWT 2.0 on Windows XP Pro 64
bit, I'm unable to debug as GWT skips most of my Breakpoints. When I
uninstalled the plugin and set my default SDK to 1.7.1, Hosted browser mode
doesn't work anymore. I was asked to install a
Comment by j...@google.com:
64-bit IE is not currently supported.
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/TroubleshootingOOPHM
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Comment by monish.ar:
I think GWT 2.0 broke my installation of the previous version. I think I
have to start a new Eclipse install and stick to 1.7.1 for now.
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/TroubleshootingOOPHM
--
Comment by j...@google.com:
You can have multiple versions of GWT installed at once and the current
Eclipse plugin should work with any of them.
Also, GWT 1.7.1 isn't going to give you devmode with a 64-bit browser
either.
For more information:
Revision: 7313
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 15 11:15:10 2009
Log: Fix integer overflow in BigInteger calculation.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7313
Modified:
/changes/jat/bigdecimal/user/super/com/google/gwt/emul/java/math/BitLevel.java
Hey, Matt,
I've now double checked on several browsers other than Opera, and I
agree that onerror works on non-IE and onreadystatechange works on IE.
Details here:
http://blog.lexspoon.org/2009/12/detecting-download-failures-with-script.html
One tricky aspect is that I don't see how to get IE
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote:
Ideas would be welcome about how to deal with that.
Could the fragments include some JS at the end which calls a well-known I
loaded successfully method?
--
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google
--
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:53 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote:
Ideas would be welcome about how to deal with that.
Could the fragments include some JS at the end which calls a well-known I
loaded successfully method?
Comment by monish.ar:
Thanks for your reply. Yeah, actually that's what I assumed. I've had 1.7.1
running until now in the hosted mode without any problems. Once I installed
version 2.0 and started having problems with debugging, I switched back to
1.7.1 SDK but in vain. The problem still
On 15-Dec-09, at 12:48 PM, Lex Spoon wrote:
I've now double checked on several browsers other than Opera, and I
agree that onerror works on non-IE and onreadystatechange works on IE.
Details here:
http://blog.lexspoon.org/2009/12/detecting-download-failures-with-script.html
One tricky
Revision: 7314
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 15 13:07:59 2009
Log: Fixing error message on script tag with conditionals in .gwt.xml.
Issue: 3746
Review by: cramsdale
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7314
Modified:
Revision: 7315
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 15 13:40:53 2009
Log: Update Scheduler API.
- Add EntryCommands
- Add repeating FinallyCommand
- Always empty the FinallyCommand queue before returning to the browser
Add state-getting method to Impl and add a fix for the finally block
Sorry to jump in here, but that looks almost like data bindings Ray. I
missed that feature of uibinder too. I tried it out and you're able to
bind from a POJO during initialization, I wonder if that could be used
as a starting point to do data bindings on set and get. Thanks!
--
Arthur Kalmenson
Revision: 7316
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 15 13:45:42 2009
Log: Don't ignore !important when attempting to merge CSS rules by content.
Resolves issue 4304.
Patch by: bobv
Review by: rjrjr
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7316
Modified:
LGTM.
But gee, Mike, what can the framework actually DO?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/117805/diff/2047/1046
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/util/Either.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/117805/diff/2047/1046#newcode28
Line 28: throw new IllegalArgumentException();
Revision: 7317
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 15 16:53:51 2009
Log: Make @url and the gwt-image property of @sprite blocks accept dot-path
values so that they can be used with nested ClientBundles.
Resolves issue 4341.
Patch by: bobv
Review by: rjrjr
Lex,
Next patch will contains 3 optimizations. Promise! :)
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/117805/diff/2047/1046
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/util/Either.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/117805/diff/2047/1046#newcode76
Line 76: return true;
On 2009/12/15 23:00:37,
Merged into http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126803
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/117805
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 7318
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 15 19:43:09 2009
Log: Fixes UiBinder IndexOutOfBound errors on public void set() methods.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4250
contributed by Thomas Matthijs
review by rjrjr
Revision: 7319
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 15 19:51:30 2009
Log: Fixes Javadoc errors on DislcosurePanels in UiBinder
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4329
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7319
Modified:
Revision: 7320
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 15 21:43:16 2009
Log: Merges tr...@7318 and 7319 into releases/2.0
IndexOutOfBounds fix for UiBinder, JavaDoc fixes for DisclosurePanel
svn merge --ignore-ancestry -r7317:7319
https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk .
Reviewers: jat,
Message:
Review requested.
Description:
This patch adds resymbolization to JUnitShell so that stack traces from
GWTTestCases change from
Unknown.az
to
com.example.Class.someMethod()
Additionally, it turns emulated stack traces on for all browsers to
ensure consistent
LGTM with one question.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126806/diff/1/2
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/linker/SymbolMapsLinker.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126806/diff/1/2#newcode88
Line 88: boolean isJunit = context.getModuleName().endsWith(.JUnit);
This is
Revision: 7321
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 15 23:07:53 2009
Log: Improve tests for better coverage of BigDecimal/etc.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7321
Modified:
39 matches
Mail list logo
