I've made a set of poms for gwt-dev, gwt-user, gwt-servlet, gwt-soyc-
vis and gwt-bikeshed that builds from the current 2.1-SNAPSHOT (Except
building bikeshed was broken with the changes made over the weekend).
They all work with gwt-maven-plugin (only gwt-dev needs the
dependencies to be bundled
I think that .project, .classpath and .checkstyle files should be
included. All the other samples have those files imported. It is
possible to create the eclipse project from sources but I think it would
be much more convenient if the project was already created for the user.
I also think that
Is it possible to use a linker to scan the source files which were
compiled? I would think that linker has access only to files that are
actually output of the compilePerms (and possible PreCompile), but I
may very well be wrong
If I cannot use linker to analyze java code, is there a hook
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Marko Vuksanovic markovuksano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is it possible to use a linker to scan the source files which were
compiled? I would think that linker has access only to files that are
actually output of the compilePerms (and possible PreCompile), but I
may
Thanks for the response, John. Are there any plans to implement
something like this?
On Jun 21, 3:16 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Marko Vuksanovic markovuksano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is it possible to use a linker to scan the source files which were
On 2010/06/17 08:52:37, Konstantin.Scheglov wrote:
Thanks, LGTM. Submitted at r8281.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/633801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Marko Vuksanovic markovuksano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the response, John. Are there any plans to implement
something like this?
Not that I know of. Linkers may run on a machine separate from where the
source is, so allowing them access to the source
LGTM
With the note that it might make sense to just pull some of the
deprecated code than try to fix it.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/643801/diff/1/5
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/PopupPanel.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/643801/diff/1/5#newcode1362
Well, the idea is to be able to somehow analyze the input and see how
it is related to some output. I know that it is possible to achieve
this without messing gwt compiler itself (just run some code before
the compiler starts its job). Its just that it would be a nice feature
to be able to take
@jat, Any news about this?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/620802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/636801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Sure - that sounds reasonable - I'll add those today.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:49 AM, markovuksano...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that .project, .classpath and .checkstyle files should be
included. All the other samples have those files imported. It is
possible to create the eclipse project
Hi Googlers^H^H G-men!
Do you have any ETA for 2.1 M2 (or RC1?), and/or 2.1 GA?
We're looking at RequestFactory, ActivityManager and data presentation
widgets for a new project, but they're far from complete now
(particularly RequestFactory, and ActivityManager isn't plugged with
the History).
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/640803/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 8289
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Mon Jun 21 06:45:34 2010
Log: Removes redundant width/height parsing in DockLayoutPanel.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/633802
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8289
Modified:
Revision: 8290
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Mon Jun 21 08:04:24 2010
Log: Adds a simple JJS test to verify that enums compile.
TODO: improve this test.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/640803/show
Review by: spoon
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8290
Added:
LGTM with comments
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/636801/diff/6001/7003
File /bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/collections/MutableSet.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/636801/diff/6001/7003#newcode23
/bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/collections/MutableSet.java:23: * creating
the
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/638801/diff/1/3
File plugins/xpcom/Makefile (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/638801/diff/1/3#newcode130
plugins/xpcom/Makefile:130: -lxpcomglue_s -lxpcom -lnspr4 -lmozjs
for 3.7 we also need to link against mozalloc
ifeq ($BROWSER,ff40)
DLLFLAGS
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/649801/diff/1/88
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/ValueBoxBase.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/649801/diff/1/88#newcode46
user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/ValueBoxBase.java:46:
SourcesChangeEvents, HasChangeHandlers,
While this shouldn't be taken as a binding set of dates, we are looking to
wrap up a 2.1 RC in late Q3, with GA release in early Q4.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Googlers^H^H G-men!
Do you have any ETA for 2.1 M2 (or RC1?), and/or 2.1 GA?
We're also working to get the new widgets libraries stabilized well before
that, though we don't have hard dates. One thing to look for would be the
removal of the Note: This class is new and its interface subject to
change. warnings in the javadoc. Or just ask here :)
Le 21 juin 2010 14:29,
On 2010/06/18 15:02:50, Konstantin.Scheglov wrote:
Thanks, LGTM. Committed at r8289.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/633802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Thanks, Stephen.
@Dan: Is this still applicable, or has it been fixed already?
Le 9 juin 2010 13:21, Stephen Haberman step...@exigencecorp.com a écrit :
Hi,
I was playing with the Mail example this morning and saw a stack trace
casting the Message class to Comparable for the TreeMap inside
Reviewers: jat, jlabanca,
Description:
Adds integral BiDi support to Label.java and its descendants. Introduces
a new interface, HasAutoHorizontalAlignment.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/642803/show
Affected files:
M
Le 19 juin 2010 10:34, Konstantin.Scheglov konstantin.scheg...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Why existing horizontal/vertical alignment parsers use so unfriendly
names for alignments? ALIGN_RIGHT looks not very good in XML. Why
not just right? This would be more natural for people with HTML
FYI - let's do one more round
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/636801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On 2010/06/21 20:22:27, Dan Rice wrote:
FYI - let's do one more round
Sure
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/636801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
FYI
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/620802/diff/8001/9001
File user/super/com/google/gwt/emul/java/util/AbstractList.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/620802/diff/8001/9001#newcode144
user/super/com/google/gwt/emul/java/util/AbstractList.java:144: }
I think you also need to
Looks like the code is still the same as what he is seeing -- I
haven't seen the stack trace and don't know how to repo it but the fix
seems reasonable.
Dan
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
Thanks, Stephen.
@Dan: Is this still applicable, or has it been
I have one question...
in javadoc is says
The semantics of the list returned by this method become undefined if
the backing list (i.e., this list) is structurally modified in any way
other than via the returned list. (Structural modifications are those
that change the size of this list, or
Reviewers: fredsa,
Description:
Better implementation for getHandlers (the old one threw an exception in
Web mode)
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/651801/show
Affected files:
M user/src/com/google/gwt/logging/impl/LoggerImplRegular.java
Index:
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/651801/diff/1/2
File user/src/com/google/gwt/logging/impl/LoggerImplRegular.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/651801/diff/1/2#newcode64
user/src/com/google/gwt/logging/impl/LoggerImplRegular.java:64: return
handlers.toArray(new
sweet - thanks for the quick review!
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:41 PM, j...@google.com wrote:
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/651801/diff/1/2
File user/src/com/google/gwt/logging/impl/LoggerImplRegular.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/651801/diff/1/2#newcode64
Reviewers: fredsa,
Description:
Remove the Remote Logger checkbox (forgotten when I removed the code to
handle this box)
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/618802/show
Affected files:
M
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/618802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 8291
Author: unn...@google.com
Date: Mon Jun 21 15:04:17 2010
Log: Remove the Remote Logger checkbox (forgotten when I removed the code
to handle this box)
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/618802
Review by: fre...@google.com
36 matches
Mail list logo
