Hey GWT(ers),
I've heard from many of you that GWT apps simply don't look that good out of
the box, and styling the default app would go a long way. We couldn't agree
more. As some of you know, GWT 2.1 (with the help of Spring Roo 1.1) will
generate a full-fledged scaffolding app that users can
Google Adwords contains good looking business widgets (buttons,
dropdowns, wizards, etc). How about open-sourcing some of those?
On Aug 6, 2:44 pm, Chris Ramsdale cramsd...@google.com wrote:
Hey GWT(ers),
I've heard from many of you that GWT apps simply don't look that good out of
the box,
Reviewers: Dan Rice,
Description:
Fixing a couple of typos in JavaDoc.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/720802/show
Affected files:
M user/src/com/google/gwt/app/place/ActivityManager.java
M user/src/com/google/gwt/cell/client/ClickableTextCell.java
Index:
Reviewers: Dan Rice,
Description:
Adding missing keyboardSelected styles to CellTable.css sub classes used
by ExpenseList and ExpenseDetails.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/713803/show
Affected files:
M
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/720802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
Is there a way to inherit these rather than having to redeclare them in
every app?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/713803/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 8495
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Fri Aug 6 04:02:11 2010
Log: Adding missing keyboardSelected styles to CellTable.css sub classes
used by ExpenseList and ExpenseDetails.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/713803
I couldn't find a way to inherit them, but its on my TODO list to find
out if its possible.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/713803/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 8496
Author: r...@google.com
Date: Fri Aug 6 06:29:40 2010
Log: De-bounce built-in selection models
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/722802
Review by: rj...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8496
Modified:
On Friday, August 06, 2010 00:48:34 codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Revision: 8484
Author: cromwell...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 4 22:08:44 2010
Log: Fix support for null fields and Boolean type types in RequestFactory.
Null fix patch by icsy
Review at
On Aug 5, 10:38 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
How do you know you are getting a serialized exception rather than some
random error page returned by the server?
This almost sounds rhetorical, but...
*I* know I'm getting the serialized exception that my code threw from
the RPC
Reviewers: cromwellian,
Description:
Removed the RequestDataManager class that is no longer used.
Patch by: amitmanjhi
Review by: cromwellian (tbr)
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/743801/show
Affected files:
D
As we chatted over IM, the RequestDataManager class was not deleted in an
earlier patch, as it should have been. Prepared a patch that deletes the
class:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/743801/show
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:14 AM, cromwell...@google.com wrote:
committed as r8495
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/713803/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/704803/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/717801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM++
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/704803/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/725804/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 8497
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Fri Aug 6 11:09:15 2010
Log: Fixing a couple of typos in JavaDoc.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/720802
Review by: r...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8497
Modified:
committed as r8497
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/720802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I'm not having much luck with this patch either. The problem I have
is with enums.
If I have a record with:
PropertyPhoneType phoneType = new
EnumPropertyPhoneType(phoneType, PhoneType.class,
PhoneType.values());
This works well if the row is created on the server and sent to the
client. The
Revision: 8498
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Fri Aug 6 11:42:27 2010
Log: Removed the RequestDataManager class that is no longer used.
Patch by: amitmanjhi
Review by: cromwellian (tbr)
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/743801
Revision: 8499
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Fri Aug 6 11:47:57 2010
Log: Remaining changes to bikeshed/scaffold app as a result of using Long
ids instead of String ids.
Patch by: amitmanjhi
Review by: cromwellian (tbr)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8499
I'm going to change it to treat undefined as null. In theory, I could change
RecordJsoImpl to initialize all property fields to null or a default value,
according to JLS semantics, but this just makes the client code bigger, and
JSON transfers bigger. Anyone object?
-Ray
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at
On Friday, August 06, 2010 18:05:04 Ray Cromwell wrote:
I'm going to change it to treat undefined as null. In theory, I could
change RecordJsoImpl to initialize all property fields to null or a
default value, according to JLS semantics, but this just makes the client
code bigger, and JSON
Comment by northrup...@gmail.com:
please suggest commandline and maven-gwt-plugins switches for 2 core, 4
core, and 8 core workstations
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/JavaSystemPropertiesAndGwt
--
Reviewers: Ray Ryan,
Description:
Public: Simple implementation of ConstraintViolation,
ConstraintDescriptor, Path and Node.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/735802/show
Affected files:
A user/src/com/google/gwt/validation/client/ConstraintViolationImpl.java
A
I'll take bigger and functional over smaller and throwing exceptions
any old day of the week
On Aug 6, 6:05 pm, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm going to change it to treat undefined as null. In theory, I could change
RecordJsoImpl to initialize all property fields to null or a
LGTM
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:58 PM, cromwell...@google.com wrote:
Reviewers: amitmanjhi,
Description:
Treat undefined Record properties on JSOs as nulls
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/744801/show
Affected files:
M
Revision: 8501
Author: cromwell...@google.com
Date: Fri Aug 6 14:02:08 2010
Log: Treat undefined Record properties on JSOs as nulls
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/744801
Review by: amitman...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8501
Modified:
30 matches
Mail list logo
