[gwt-contrib] Patch for http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7307 (issue1680804)

2012-04-11 Thread t . broyer
Could you make your patch using trunk/ as the base URL? Also, I think it should be possible to add a unit-test using a Duration (or System.currentTimeMillis()) initialized in an entry command and checked in a finally command to be less than TIME_SLICE. ...and checking that there's no premature

[gwt-contrib] Re: Issue 6331: Let AutoBean accept numbers for dates and longs (issue1601805)

2012-04-11 Thread skybrian
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1601805/diff/11002/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/shared/ValueCodex.java File user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/shared/ValueCodex.java (right):

[gwt-contrib] Re: Issue 6331: Let AutoBean accept numbers for dates and longs (issue1601805)

2012-04-11 Thread t . broyer
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1601805/diff/11002/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/shared/ValueCodex.java File user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/shared/ValueCodex.java (right):

[gwt-contrib] Re: Issue 6331: Let AutoBean accept numbers for dates and longs (issue1601805)

2012-04-11 Thread skybrian
Okay, thanks for the explanation. The thing about consistency is that there are so many things to choose from :-) Since BigDecimal / BigInteger didn't work before, I think we can wait on those. Backward compatibility when expanding the range is an issue but I'm not sure that changing types is

[gwt-contrib] Re: Call for forgotten patches

2012-04-11 Thread Patrick Tucker
Maybe you guys could take a look at this one too? http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5424 On Thursday, March 8, 2012 9:22:11 PM UTC-5, Ray Cromwell wrote: Greetings Contributors, First an apology, I realize many of you have put a lot of work into contributing to