Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2240
Change subject: fixing mismatch in Double.isInfinite between dev /
production
..
fixing mismatch in Double.isInfinite between
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: fixing mismatch in Double.isInfinite between dev /
production
..
Patch Set 1:
Could you add a test to
On Saturday, March 16, 2013 1:28:23 AM UTC+1, James Nelson wrote:
Thanks @ Rob for notifying branding experts.
The consensus from most of the steering committee is that they like the
logo as well,
and I for one, pretty much agree.
Going way out there on a new logo would lose all built up
Daniel Kurka has abandoned this change.
Change subject: fixing mismatch in Double.isInfinite between dev /
production
..
Abandoned
error
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2240
To unsubscribe, visit
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-pyhhwBZBseY/UUSdBOkq4tI/AFk/F1BBytRaNSw/s1600/jn_gwt_logo_v1.jpg
Just had some time and the above logo is the result ;-) I renamed toolkit
to toolbox to get a better association to the box icon. The perspective
of the box isn't pixel perfect, but I
Your welcome @ James (although your comment does seem a
little disingenuous).
And, thank you @ James for helping to build a sense of community.
--
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hello Everyone,
I am a little confused about some issues I encountered on the issue tracker and
need some help.
This one is about a static field on a JSO:
https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8060
From the docs:
Overlay types cannot have instance fields. The fields
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Daniel Kurka kurka.dan...@gmail.comwrote:
I am a little confused about some issues I encountered on the issue
tracker and need some help.
This one is about a static field on a JSO:
https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8060
From the
Thanks John for clearing this up. This was exactly what I had in mind. I will
close the issue AsDesigned, maybe we should document this is little better.
-Daniel
Am 16.03.2013 um 20:40 schrieb John A. Tamplin j...@jaet.org:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Daniel Kurka kurka.dan...@gmail.com
The problem with this answer is that the failure is silent and surprising
for Java developers, and that the optimizations can make it even more so.
If I recall correctly, calling a static method in the same type from an
instance method is not enough to get the static initializer called - an
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Colin Alworth niloc...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem with this answer is that the failure is silent and surprising
for Java developers, and that the optimizations can make it even more so.
If I recall correctly, calling a static method in the same type from an
I am having trouble lately with updating commits in gerrit:
Anyone else seeing something like this?
kurt@kmac:~/Documents/workspace-mgwt/gwt$ git push origin HEAD:refs/changes/2220
Counting objects: 21, done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (9/9), done.
Writing
Am 16.03.2013 um 22:43 schrieb John A. Tamplin j...@jaet.org:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Colin Alworth niloc...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem with this answer is that the failure is silent and surprising for
Java developers, and that the optimizations can make it even more so. If I
I should add. This seems to happen to all my recent changes once I try to amend
them and update the commit in gerrit.
-Daniel
Am 16.03.2013 um 22:45 schrieb Daniel Kurka kurka.dan...@gmail.com:
I am having trouble lately with updating commits in gerrit:
Anyone else seeing something like
- http://brandcrowd.com/logo-design/categories/computer_and_networking/
--
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
Ah ah, love that new acronym: GWT = Gorgeous Web Toolkit/box ;-)
(I prefer toolkit to toolbox, it rhymes with GWiT)
On Saturday, March 16, 2013 5:32:02 PM UTC+1, Jens wrote:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-pyhhwBZBseY/UUSdBOkq4tI/AFk/F1BBytRaNSw/s1600/jn_gwt_logo_v1.jpg
Just had
On Saturday, March 16, 2013 10:45:31 PM UTC+1, Daniel Kurka wrote:
I am having trouble lately with updating commits in gerrit:
Anyone else seeing something like this?
kurt@kmac:~/Documents/workspace-mgwt/gwt$ git push origin
HEAD:refs/changes/2220
Any reason you're not just pushing
Hello John A. Tamplin, Janek Bogucki, Brian Slesinsky,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2220
to look at the new patch set (#4).
Change subject: add Class.getSimpleName to gwt emulation
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: add Class.getSimpleName to gwt emulation
..
Patch Set 4:
some nit picking
@James
Lets discuss your suggestions in a new review / issue.
--
To view, visit
John A. Tamplin has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: add Class.getSimpleName to gwt emulation
..
Patch Set 4: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2220
To unsubscribe, visit
Thanks Thomas, somehow pushing directly to the branch didn`t work on other
changes I had opened, but now this seems fine.
Am 17.03.2013 um 00:14 schrieb Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com:
On Saturday, March 16, 2013 10:45:31 PM UTC+1, Daniel Kurka wrote:
I am having trouble lately with
If you call a method or access a field from pure JS, you aren't going to
get the JSO implementation -
com.google.gwt.dom.client.Element.removeClassName(String) doesn't exist in
the underlying browser, so we build it in Java, and talk to methods/fields
which *do* exist in the browser. In other
22 matches
Mail list logo
