Crickets...
On Friday, November 22, 2013 4:58:10 PM UTC-5, Patrick Tucker wrote:
Why is Range not a shared class? If for some strange reason it needs to
be client only, why does it implement Serializable?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received
Em sexta-feira, 22 de novembro de 2013 16h16min06s UTC-3, Goktug Gokdogan
escreveu:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Danilo Reinert
danilo...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Hi all,
Finally I've made an acceptable implementation of ListT for
JavaScriptObjects.
Thanks to T. Broyer's
This system property isn't listed when either dev mode or the compiler runs
because it is a system property, not a program arg. It should be provided
with the other VM args when you start Java. These aren't listed as part of
the normal properties, but are documented here:
Thanks Colin
2013/12/9 Colin Alworth niloc...@gmail.com
This system property isn't listed when either dev mode or the compiler
runs because it is a system property, not a program arg. It should be
provided with the other VM args when you start Java. These aren't listed as
part of the normal
Hm, so is building with Java 6 a new requirement due to how we implemented
Java 7 support in GWT? I thought I used Java 7 to build the GWT 2.5.1
release too, but I can make sure to use Java 6 instead going forward to
build releases/release candidates/snapshots.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:40 AM,
It seems that the build script needs to pass -sourceLevel 6 when compiling
.gwtars (which we seem to ship incompiled form). I think I saw a patch or
email regarding that issue.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com wrote:
Hm, so is building with Java 6 a new
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8486
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
