Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 : precompile and incremental flags

2014-10-22 Thread Jérémie Gottero
Just curious, but didn't svn change (maybe a year ago or so?) to only using one top-level .svn folder, similar to Git's top-level .git folder, and not having .svn littered throughout the file system? - Stephen You're right, but we have scripts that still rely on .svn folders, so we

Re: [gwt-contrib] 2.7.0-beta1 deferredjs bypasses application cache

2014-10-22 Thread Thomas Broyer
On Monday, October 20, 2014 10:49:13 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote: IIRC, Brian changed the behavior of the xsiframe linker to match the direct-install linker, because most browsers would otherwise not display the source maps. There should be flag to turn it off and go back to the

Re: [gwt-contrib] 2.7.0-beta1 deferredjs bypasses application cache

2014-10-22 Thread Richard Wallis
Thanks, just checked and set-configuration-property name=installCode value=true / also fixes the problem, so I'll use that instead of adding the linker. On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, October 20, 2014 10:49:13 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 SDM incremental output too large

2014-10-22 Thread Jens
Hi, Our app produces permutations about 3.5mb in size when doing optimized production builds. It is roughly 150.000 fields across 12.000 types (according to the first SDM incremental compile output). I tried that app with several browsers (all Mac OS) to see how things work with SDM

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 SDM incremental output too large

2014-10-22 Thread Rene Hangstrup Møller
Our application is roughly the same size (3.5mb) and I have never been able to debug using source maps in firefox. It freezes when it has to load them. I have also tried remote javascript debugging with super devmode from IntelliJ. I can typically step over a couple of breakpoints and then it

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 snapshot and Eclipse Plugin

2014-10-22 Thread Matic Petek
Thank you for that, but right know my main target is to move our projects to GWT 2.7 and migrate our developers to SDM. Regards, Matic On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 8:50:01 PM UTC+2, Brandon Donnelson wrote: Ah, thanks for sharing. I just wanted to double check. By the way if you're

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 snapshot and Eclipse Plugin

2014-10-22 Thread Richard Wallis
Hi Brandon, The GWTP plugin has GPE as a dependency. Can you send me a link to the preview please. On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Matic Petek maticpe...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for that, but right know my main target is to move our projects to GWT 2.7 and migrate our developers to SDM.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 SDM incremental output too large

2014-10-22 Thread 'Ray Cromwell' via GWT Contributors
Post 2.7, we're going to look into pruning down the incremental output. However, this won't solve poor sourcemap implementations in other browsers. One option is to get source-map support improved directly in Eclipse/IntelliJ, so that the Javascript-based developer tools are not used, rather, the

Re: [gwt-contrib] 2.7.0-beta1 deferredjs bypasses application cache

2014-10-22 Thread Richard Wallis
Just an update in case someone else runs into this issue installCode = true does not fix the problem, I'm back to adding std linker. On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Richard Wallis rdwal...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, just checked and set-configuration-property name=installCode value=true /

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 SDM incremental output too large

2014-10-22 Thread Rene Hangstrup Møller
Good point. When I tried remote js debugging with sourcemaps from intellij I thought about the irony og the setup. You have the source in your IDE. Then you push the source and mappings to the compiled output into the browser, and then you remote control the debugger from the IDE. It would be

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 SDM incremental output too large

2014-10-22 Thread 'John Stalcup' via GWT Contributors
We're planning to do some work (link time pruning) to reduce incremental output size some time before the end of the year. On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Rene Hangstrup Møller rhmol...@gmail.com wrote: Good point. When I tried remote js debugging with sourcemaps from intellij I thought about