I'm not seeing the http://www.gwtproject.org/doctype/2.7.0/gwt-module.dtd
resources. Either they have been updated, or I configured the assembly
wrong and there not getting copied in the build to generated site.
Ping. Still doesn't seem to be uploaded yet?
-- J.
--
You received this
On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 11:38:44 AM UTC+1, Jens wrote:
I'm not seeing the http://www.gwtproject.org/doctype/2.7.0/gwt-module.dtd
resources. Either they have been updated, or I configured the assembly
wrong and there not getting copied in the build to generated site.
Ping.
Yes we have to modify the gwt-site-uploader to uplaod the .dtd files. I
will try to spent some time on that tonight.
On Wed Nov 12 2014 at 3:32:58 PM Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 11:38:44 AM UTC+1, Jens wrote:
I'm not seeing the
I did an uploader rewrite a while back to upload all the files and this
also serves them through the servlet if you're interested in that code I
can share?
On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 6:47:12 AM UTC-8, Julien Dramaix wrote:
Yes we have to modify the gwt-site-uploader to uplaod the .dtd
[+cc stalcup@]
This might be because of incremental compilation: when JsArrayListWrapper
is in another module, that module is precompiled, so the compiler knows
about the type. When it's in the same module, because it's the module being
compiled, it can be pruned (unused) and as consequence
Ok sounds good, will get that out shortly.
On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:06:17 PM UTC-8, Julien Dramaix wrote:
yep sure, every improvement is welcome !
On Wed Nov 12 2014 at 4:41:32 PM Brandon Donnelson branfl...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
I did an uploader rewrite a while back to
GWT compiles Java, a garbage collected language. asmjs doesn't support
garbage collection, so the translation would be difficult. String's
have no simple mapping. I don't think the performance win would be all
that big. We shipped Angry Birds for the Web written in GWT in 2012,
back when JS was a
