Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Size of output is little large

2016-12-13 Thread Kirill Prazdnikov
That sounds very good, can you share the source ? The 3) and 4) is most interesting. Thanks Ray Cromwell: > > FYI: https://plus.google.com/+RayCromwell/posts/VK8URgZiLbS > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe f

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Size of output is little large

2016-12-13 Thread 'Ray Cromwell' via GWT Contributors
FYI: https://plus.google.com/+RayCromwell/posts/VK8URgZiLbS On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Colin Alworth wrote: > Class literals for any object which can be created need to exist for > getClass(), which is called by toString() at the very least - if the > compiler sees any Object.toString, it

[gwt-contrib] Re: Size of output is little large

2016-12-13 Thread Colin Alworth
Class literals for any object which can be created need to exist for getClass(), which is called by toString() at the very least - if the compiler sees any Object.toString, it must leave in all getClass methods - further reasoning about that might be tricky, and is a little out of my wheelhouse

[gwt-contrib] Re: Size of output is little large

2016-12-13 Thread Kirill Prazdnikov
Hello, Thanks for the explanation, did the job, and removed "$wnd.setTimeout($entry(assertCompileTimeUserAgent));" at the entry point. But document.compatMode.severity=IGNORE did not change anything in code generation, it still generates severity = ($clinit_DocumentModeAsserter$Severit