Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Thoughts on DevMode

2017-01-15 Thread Stephen Haberman
I'll try to keep it short... > When I’m trying to find out why my presentation layer DOM element didn’t > receive some DOM attribute as result of computation, this is bug in the > presentation layer, which was abstracted together with browser in your > approach > Yes, you can assert/debug against

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Thoughts on DevMode

2017-01-15 Thread Stephen Haberman
> This community needs more people *doing* stuff. Agreed (although I'm calling the kettle black here). I think historically GWT was really hard to contribute to; as you said, it was a single toolkit, and had a lot of complexity in it (non-trivial optimizations, non-trivial old browser support, et

[gwt-contrib] Re: Thoughts on DevMode

2017-01-15 Thread Ivan Markov
> > > Thank you, GWT people, for spending your time answering my thoughts. > > > To summarize (and TLDR), these were responses in the thread: > > > Ivan Markov: We should improve javascript-side debugging to match DevMode. > > Jens: Google is busy doing other things, so no hope with gwtromium. > >

[gwt-contrib] Re: Thoughts on DevMode

2017-01-15 Thread sannysan...@gmail.com
Thank you, GWT people, for spending your time answering my thoughts. To summarize (and TLDR), these were responses in the thread: Ivan Markov: We should improve javascript-side debugging to match DevMode. Jens: Google is busy doing other things, so no hope with gwtromium. Jens: Change your a