The call two weeks ago
(https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/Tqgfb3QgGS0/discussion)
was fairly successful, so we're doing it again. Structure is again quite
light, there will be a few items to get discussion going, and we'll let it
take its own life from there.
While I haven't been considering any particular sources, should I have
to time and the inclination at the same time to look into it, was
wanting to have a clearer picture of what is or isn't a good path to follow.
On 6/16/20 11:42 AM, Colin Alworth wrote:
As an example, there is code
I am not a lawyer, so I tend toward a very conservative interpretation of
anything we come up with, and none of this is actual legal advice, just my
understanding.
GWT is licensed/distributed under the Apache Public License 2.0, so any
code contributed must be compatible with that license to
Is there a doc which indicates which licenses are acceptable for
imported code for use by the JRE Emulation?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 7:44:34 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> FYI, I've made a couple more tests, and added the results to the README:
> https://github.com/tbroyer/gwt-relocation-tests
> Unsurprisingly, the "dumb" resolution rules ("nearest definition") of
> Maven makes it
