Thanks. definitely wouldn't hold up 2.8 for it. Are you planning on doing
any more compiler enhancements after 2.8 or is it all hands on deck for
J2CL?
On Sunday, May 1, 2016 at 10:06:34 PM UTC-4, Ray Cromwell wrote:
>
> A quick fix would be, in a linker, to substitute "new $wnd.Object"
> with
A quick fix would be, in a linker, to substitute "new $wnd.Object"
with "{}". It's possible to write a peephole pass to fix this in the
Compiler, but I think given the number of people clamoring for GWT 2.8
and the other more pressing issues, this would be low on the totem
pole.
On Sun, May 1,
When you define an object literal as
@JsType(isNative = true, namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL, name="Object")
public class SomeObjLiteral {
}
Calling new on this results in the following javascript code 'new $wnd.Object'.
You could just emit {} instead.
It is surprising the number times you