Am I the only one to have this problem ?
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear GWT lovers,
I've just tried to compile several projects with the last snapshot of GWT
2.7.0 using the PRETTY mode flag and several permutations. I noticed that
only
Can you reproduce that from the command line in a regular compile? If so
can you post all the flags passed to the compiler?
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am I the only one to have this problem ?
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Julien Dramaix
I could verify the issue.
A clue, It seems that the last emitted permutation is the only one
un-obfuscated.
As a workaround you can collapse-all-properties, and the result is PRETTY
- Manolo
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am I the only one to
Roberto, in my case this is the command line:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_05.jdk/Contents/Home/jre/bin/java
-Xmx512m -classpath . . . -Dgwt.persistentunitcachedir= target
com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler -logLevel INFO -style PRETTY -war
target/v-demo-1.0-SNAPSHOT -localWorkers 8
I also can reproduce this - when style is set to PRETTY, 4 of the 17
permutations starts off with the PRETTY setup code (from the linker?), then
moves on to have all obfuscated (and sorted, etc) JS from the compilation
process:
var $wnd = $wnd || window.parent;
var __gwtModuleFunction =
I'll look into it.
Manolo,
Do you know what is the Building Unknown Task that is showing in our
jenkins instance?
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino man...@apache.org
wrote:
Roberto, in my case this is the command line:
Fixed. Review at https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9432.
The issue is only present with -localWorkers 1 and all workers except the
first would get incorrect options.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Roberto Lublinerman rlu...@google.com
wrote:
I'll look into it.
Manolo,
Do you know
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 1:23 AM, 'Roberto Lublinerman' via GWT Contributors
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote:
I'll look into it.
Manolo,
Do you know what is the Building Unknown Task that is showing in our
jenkins instance?
There is a hidden task in our server which
