I'll see if I can whittle things down to a manageable sample app. On Apr 8, 8:01 am, Lex Spoon <sp...@google.com> wrote: > Hey, Jay, > > I haven't replicated the problem using your example, but I think I see the > bug anyway. There is an optimization to simplify at compile time > expressions like 2004318071+'', and it is converting the number part to a > string using the equivalent of Double.toString. That is where the > scientific notation comes from. However, a real JSVM apparently has a > different algorithm for turning a number into a string. > > I'll work on the JsStaticEval bug. Here's an issue for it: > > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4830 > > Jay, if you can minimize the problem down to something I can replicate, I > can test that it is in fact the problem you are seeing. Alternatively, have > you ever built and used GWT from trunk? IF so, you could verify the fix > once it's committed. > > -Lex
-- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
