Thanks! I think this proposal is the most conservative way to enhance
GWT.create(). A more radical approach would be to forget GWT.create() and
imitate what scala macros do, as was suggested by Gotktug:
@Macro(SumGenerator.class)
int sum(int arg0, int arg1) {
return 0; // we
For posterity's sake, could you drop those links off here (or are you
referring to the ones Ray posted in the G+ community? The phrase javac 8
doesn't ring any bells for me).
Nevermind. I just browsed the group and saw the thread. My bad.
--
Hi James, thanks for your feedback!
Note that the @GwtCreate class parameters aren't replaced by
GwtCreateFactory as was originally suggested by Ray Cromwell. This provides
access to actual parameters.
It would be possible to do a full replacement if the factory also gave
access to
I like it!
I've got a few comments / ideas, but overall, I'm glad to see more work
being done to empower core GWT functionality.
Note that the @GwtCreate class parameters aren't replaced by
GwtCreateFactory as was originally suggested by Ray Cromwell. This provides
access to actual
I forgot to upload the @GwtCreate annotation. You can find It here
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/4111/
Regards
- Andrés
El viernes, 16 de agosto de 2013 06:30:15 UTC-3, Andrés Testi escribió:
I've been working on a prototype inspired by Ray Cromwell's proposal for
@GwtCreate
JEnumTypeTest doesn't fails anymore, I think the issue was solved yesterday
:-)
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
