That is added relatively recent.
And thanks for pointing the documentation issue; add a issue to review all
before the final release.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Arnaud TOURNIER wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your answer.
>
> I tried the solution with defender methods earlier but it did not work
Thanks a lot for your answer.
I tried the solution with defender methods earlier but it did not work, as
far as i remember the compiler refused @JsOverlay defender methods on the
JsFunction. The @JsFunction documentation says that : "A JsFunction
interface cannot have defender methods."
I will try
The limitation around @JsFunction is basically driven from the limitations
of being a function. I think there was an earlier discussion in the
contibutor list where we explained this in more detail.
Being said that, you can handle some overloading in JsFunction interfaces
via defender methods mark
Oh thanks! I'll try that.
Once I think we need to merge our work on those topics...
Thanks!
Le mar. 30 août 2016 16:06, Paul Stockley a écrit :
> If you are passing Resolver into some function. You could instead
> create 3 Resolver interfaces and then overload the function so that it took
> eac
If you are passing Resolver into some function. You could instead
create 3 Resolver interfaces and then overload the function so that it took
each of the resolver interfaces.
On Saturday, August 27, 2016 at 9:51:50 AM UTC-4, Arnaud TOURNIER wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am playing with js Promises and m
