[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: One line patch to run emma tests as well during ant test

2009-04-24 Thread Freeland Abbott
Amit, can you review the attached patch for solution #1 as originally outlined. Do we have a short/long test breakdown for Emma (i.e. is what's there long, and EmmaClassLoading test only short)? And do we actually want to go with short/long emma, only, or more generally have a short/long

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: One line patch to run emma tests as well during ant test

2009-04-24 Thread Amit Manjhi
LGTM. Yes, the short/long test breakdown should be EmmaClassLoadingTest and others. It is okay if we do this short/long partitioning later, when we do it across all tests. Amit On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Freeland Abbott fabb...@google.comwrote: Amit, can you review the attached patch

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: One line patch to run emma tests as well during ant test

2009-04-23 Thread Freeland Abbott
Well, that will run emma tests for everyone everywhere who does ant test... Does it require anything in particular to work, which people might not have installed? And is the time significant? We can easily enough tweak the continuous builder configuration to explicitly run the emma tests, if

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: One line patch to run emma tests as well during ant test

2009-04-23 Thread Amit Manjhi
It just requires emma.jar which is pulled in from the tools dir. The time is basically the same as running hosted mode user tests. Amit On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Freeland Abbott fabb...@google.comwrote: Well, that will run emma tests for everyone everywhere who does ant test... Does

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: One line patch to run emma tests as well during ant test

2009-04-23 Thread Freeland Abbott
But now we're running them twice. I'll give you the LGTM as testing is good, but I'm a bit worried for the time penalty. But if it's a problem, we can fall back to the other approach when it's clear it's a problem. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Amit Manjhi amitman...@google.com wrote: It

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: One line patch to run emma tests as well during ant test

2009-04-23 Thread Amit Manjhi
Makes sense. Thanks. Commited as r5275 On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Freeland Abbott fabb...@google.comwrote: But now we're running them twice. I'll give you the LGTM as testing is good, but I'm a bit worried for the time penalty. But if it's a problem, we can fall back to the other

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: One line patch to run emma tests as well during ant test

2009-04-23 Thread Scott Blum
I likes #1. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Freeland Abbott fabb...@google.com wrote: Er. Can I take back my approval? It looks like test.hosted already and also runs the Emma tests, and the test.hosted.emma target has a bad test.out value. We can, I think, do any one of: 1. have

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: One line patch to run emma tests as well during ant test

2009-04-23 Thread Amit Manjhi
I like #1 as is, but would like it better with a minor modification. I think there should be 2 explicit named targets for emma stuff: one consisting of the short tests and the other consisting of long tests. The short tests should always run while the long tests should at least run during the