The cast to (T) is JsVisitor.accept() is necessary for javac 1.5.0_13
as shipped on OS X to compile the code.
Otherwise, LGTM.
What are your current thoughts on making runAsync work with XS and
SSO linkers, since they use function closures?
I'll follow up with an updated SOYC reports CL
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Ray Cromwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lex, I can just hack it for now. Long term, I would prefer a solution
that addresses in a general purpose fashion, the needs of GWT to be
aware of the container it is in, such as the ability to fetch external
resources, or
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:28 AM, BobV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The cast to (T) is JsVisitor.accept() is necessary for javac 1.5.0_13
as shipped on OS X to compile the code.
Otherwise, LGTM.
Excellent. I put back the (T), with a comment, and committed at revision 3901.
What are your
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Lex Spoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ray, I looked at this code today, and I don't believe that it is
currently possible for users to (easily) override the function. If you
get to the point where you need it before it is implemented, let's
look at it.
It
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Lex Spoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Ray Cromwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, the code that loads the async fragments must be proxy-aware for
this to work. The GadgetLinker
generateScriptInjector/generateStylesheetInjector
Are there any design docs for runAsync ?
Cheers
Cameron
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Lex Spoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Bob,
Can you be the main reviewer for the merge of the runAsync branch to
the trunk? The attached patch is the outstanding difference between
trunk and branch,
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Ray Cromwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lex,
I skimmed the CFA code, and I had perhaps a stupid question. I see
that method calls have their targets rescued, but what about
exceptions, either runtime, or explicitly thrown? Is it possible that
a non-local flow
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Lex Spoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ideally hosted mode would use a deferred
command instead of running the callback directly, but deferred
commands are not available in Core, but runAsync *is* available in
Core. I haven't run across a simple solution to this
sorry for the useless spammy reply, but I can help it: this is super
exciting
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Lex Spoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Bob,
Can you be the main reviewer for the merge of the runAsync branch to
the trunk? The attached patch is the outstanding difference
I'm super excited about this too, as well as a merge of OOPHM to trunk
:) Comment below:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Lex Spoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. The linkers are updated for this structure, though most of them
simply fail if there is more than one fragment.
This is of great
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Ray Cromwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is of great concern to me. Is there some fundamental reason why
linkers won't work with multiple fragments, or it is just that there
was an API change and some of the implementations need to be fixed?
For example, I
11 matches
Mail list logo
