On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Alex Rudnick a...@google.com wrote:
You apparently did this last year. Would you review this patch to
allow 2009 as a valid year for checkstyle?
LGTM, thanks.
(this should go into the 1.6 branch first, then into trunk at the next
merge, yes?)
Yes.
--
Thanks! :)
Committed r4380.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:32 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Alex Rudnick a...@google.com wrote:
You apparently did this last year. Would you review this patch to
allow 2009 as a valid year for checkstyle?
LGTM, thanks.
Alex -
Can you review this follow on that does the same thing for tests...
Thanks,
John LaBanca
jlaba...@google.com
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Alex Rudnick a...@google.com wrote:
Thanks! :)
Committed r4380.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:32 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:15 PM, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com wrote:
Can you review this follow on that does the same thing for tests...
LGTM
--
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
