Re: [gwt-contrib] now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2009-12-17 Thread Arthur Kalmenson
Working on a draft one. What do folks here think is important? - data binding and validation frameworks, which would remove a _lot_ of boiler plate code and greatly increase productivity. - incubator clean up and perhaps splitting it into multiple projects? GWT 2.0 release is awesome, thanks

Re: [gwt-contrib] now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2009-12-17 Thread Bart Guijt
1) Databinding a la Adobe Flex (they have *by far* the best solution[1] I've seen in all these toolkits). The GWT1.6 'HasValue' interface is a good starting point for this, hopefully it mixes well with UiBinder. 2) Scala compiler! 3) Make Compiler commandline options available to the

Re: [gwt-contrib] now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2009-12-17 Thread Xavier M.
Here are the enhancements I would like to have in GWT : * incremental compilation to have the same ease of use than with php or jsp ; we have for instance an internal application where we have merged php and gwt, and (from the ease of modification point of view) it is always simpler to make a

Re: [gwt-contrib] now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2009-12-17 Thread Johan Rydberg
On Dec 17, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Arthur Kalmenson wrote: Working on a draft one. What do folks here think is important? - data binding and validation frameworks, which would remove a _lot_ of boiler plate code and greatly increase productivity. Absolutely! - incubator clean up and perhaps

Re: [gwt-contrib] now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2009-12-17 Thread Johan Rydberg
On Dec 17, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Arthur Kalmenson wrote: Working on a draft one. What do folks here think is important? - data binding and validation frameworks, which would remove a _lot_ of boiler plate code and greatly increase productivity. - incubator clean up and perhaps splitting it

[gwt-contrib] now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2009-12-16 Thread tfreitas
What about roadmap? -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2009-12-16 Thread Bruce Johnson
Working on a draft one. What do folks here think is important? On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:42 AM, tfreitas tfrei...@gmail.com wrote: What about roadmap? -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2009-12-16 Thread Sami Jaber
Hey Bruce, GWT 2 has provided great features focusing on the hidden parts of the iceberg (devmode, codesplitting, clientbundle, ...). It would be great to focus 2.1 on the user experience and the visible part of the user framework. Here's my wish list : 0) More widgets/containers compliant with

Re: [gwt-contrib] now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2009-12-16 Thread Matt Mastracci
GWT 2.0 was so awesome, it'll be hard to top any of the new stuff with my feature wishlist. A few things I'd like: - moving as many compiler properties as possible into configuration properties so we can build an instrumented release (with type cast checking, assertions, emulated stack

Re: [gwt-contrib] now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2009-12-16 Thread David Clément
3) DataBinding Validation (btw see this post from Ray announcing something for Q1 2009 ;-) For me, it's the main feature GWT should have. Next would be pretty widgets, Drag'n Drop (in the framework, GWT DnD is very good, but DnD deserve to be in the framework by itself). And on top of it, yes,

Re: [gwt-contrib] now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2009-12-16 Thread Isaac Truett
I'd like to see SuggestBox get a little love. For example: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2311 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2739 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3409 And one of those issues links to this