Would you have any announcements for the upcoming GWT Hangout?
(Announcements don't have to be jaw dropping :))
https://plus.google.com/events/cv5u0302d3ne1a0td9nnihq6j94?authkey=CKGR6fWCvKGG5QE
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnyjOBpyOTUWdC1Vc290M19PcmxmcHRJX2E5U2Jld2c#gid=0
Gillion Web Toolkit - at 10^9
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 3:50:16 AM UTC-4, James Horsley wrote:
On 21 March 2013 07:44, James Horsley james@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
I Great this over Gorgerous Web Toolkit but still prefer the
recursive definition
That was meant to read that I
Or Grillion Web Toolkit;)
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=grillion
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 3:06:29 PM UTC-4, Samyem Tuladhar wrote:
Gillion Web Toolkit - at 10^9
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 3:50:16 AM UTC-4, James Horsley wrote:
On 21 March 2013 07:44, James Horsley
Goktug Gokdogan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Cut dependency from c.g.g.http on c.g.g.user by no longer
using Timer
..
Patch Set 6:
(3 comments)
Hey,
I've brought this up before, but if I put together a patch that added
IsXxx interfaces for all/most of the widgets (IsTextBox, etc.),
assuming the patch was otherwise fine, would the GWT team/other
contributors tend towards +1, -1, or +/-0?
- Stephen
--
--
Goktug Gokdogan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Break dependency from History to user.DOM, using dom.DOM
instead.
..
Patch Set 4: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/1242
If ever introduce isXxx, I personally want them to be future proof.
That might require deprecating some methods and introducing new ones. Also
we can use this as an opportunity to provide a compatibility layer across
different vendors and/or different widget systems.
In upcoming weeks, we will
HI,
- http://angularjs.org/
Nice logo, nice web site.
Kind of Bootstrap look and feel to the site.
Cheers
Rob
Kiahu.com
--
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
Roberto Lublinerman has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2320
Change subject: Implemented handling of GwtIncompatible annotations.
..
Implemented handling of GwtIncompatible annotations.
Roberto Lublinerman has uploaded a new patch set (#2).
Change subject: Implemented handling of GwtIncompatible annotations.
..
Implemented handling of GwtIncompatible annotations.
Any class, method or field that has an
Also we can use this as an opportunity to provide a compatibility
layer across different vendors and/or different widget systems.
I suppose, technically yes. That is more complex than what I really had
in mind...but if gets me widget interfaces, I suppose I'm interested.
In general I'm
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Stephen Haberman
step...@exigencecorp.comwrote:
Also we can use this as an opportunity to provide a compatibility
layer across different vendors and/or different widget systems.
I suppose, technically yes. That is more complex than what I really had
in
Brian Slesinsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Implemented handling of GwtIncompatible annotations.
..
Patch Set 2:
(7 comments)
Seems good so far. I'm surprised it was this simple.
Cool, I never imagined it'd be that easy, I thought you'd have to unzip the
source and hack it. Awesome work.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.comwrote:
Brian Slesinsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Implemented handling of
Brian Slesinsky has abandoned this change.
Change subject: Attempt to continue after the JDT compiler aborts.
..
Abandoned
Submitted.
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2271
To unsubscribe, visit
15 matches
Mail list logo
