One concern I have is order of operations, since the GWT.create() is
implicitly hoisted from its callsite, and I could see some crazy thing
where code in the method depends on the deferred binding not being
initialized early. It's kinda like the clinit() hoisting problem. I
say we just define
If you wanted to be guaranteed order-of-operations safety, you could
pass a factory into the method instead of the object itself and
replace the GWT.create() calls with a create() method on the factory.
AFAICT, this would have the same sequence of side-effects as
GWT.create() would.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't feel like you need to do this workaround just because I said I was
using OpenJDK - that's just the default install. I have no qualms about
installing Sun's version (it's just an apt-get away and I'm not a GPL
Ahh - gotcha. Wouldn't this be a backwards compatability issue with the
JDK? I thought Sun took those seriously (or is that only for the JVM
itself)?
Also as an aside, for some reason update-alternatives for javac was
insufficient. I have a feeling that ant looks at the java that it was run
I'm getting the plugins from the gwt-oophm branch. The current install.rdf
says 3.0.*. I manually set it to 3.1.*.
Installs fine now in 3.1.
I just built the thing from trunk, applied the previous patch for
HostedMode, and now have my gwt 1.6 project running successfully on 64-bit
Ubuntu 8.10.
Oh - one question I had is if there's a way to set the browser path?
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting the plugins from the gwt-oophm branch. The current install.rdf
says 3.0.*. I manually set it to 3.1.*.
Installs fine now in 3.1.
I just
On Mar 11, 8:42 pm, Joel Webber ѯ(ټ)ѥ j...@google.com wrote:
Code splitting, as
inhttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/CodeSplitting
The particular design we're pursuing (and by we, I mean Lex) is one that
will take asynchronous split-points you define in your application code
On Mar 11, 8:56 pm, Kelly Norton knor...@google.com wrote:
I was typing up an email and then Joel's response arrived covering much of
what I was typing, so I'll just add to his points:
The first thing I was going to mention is that, as I understand it, pyjamas
loads modules by injecting a
I'm curious why it doesn't just add a
callback to the module script to avoid the timer?
because in the way i've done it, several modules can be injected
simultaneously.
... so even if you had a callback, you'd still need to go into a
timer loop to wait for the first-level dependencies
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/11802/diff/1/3
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/SymbolData.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/11802/diff/1/3#newcode48
Line 48: }
If the class names are the same, should it then use other data for a
more complete ordering,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:55 AM, lkcl luke.leigh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm curious why it doesn't just add a
callback to the module script to avoid the timer?
because in the way i've done it, several modules can be injected
simultaneously.
... so even if you had a callback,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:36 AM, lkcl luke.leigh...@googlemail.com wrote:
i have a post-processing compile step in which i just go ok, let's
assume everything was globally imported and make sure that the first
thing an app does is dynamically load aaabsolutely everything (in the
right order
On Mar 13, 2:32 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:55 AM, lkcl luke.leigh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm curious why it doesn't just add a
callback to the module script to avoid the timer?
because in the way i've done it, several modules can be
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:26 AM, lkcl luke.leigh...@googlemail.com wrote:
i'm trying to get my head round that idea, in combination with firing
off several script-injections (using scriptnode.src = ./
Window.cache.js etc. not scriptnode.text = ...)
... and it's not working - the
On Mar 13, 2:39 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:36 AM, lkcl luke.leigh...@googlemail.com wrote:
i have a post-processing compile step in which i just go ok, let's
assume everything was globally imported and make sure that the first
thing an app does is
That's not the problem. I'm running FF3.1 beta which is firefox-3.1 on the
path (MOZ_NO_REMOTE doesn't apply since they are different profiles). I'm
probably just going to make a symlink in $HOME/bin have that prepended to
the environment path when launching OOPHM.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Fri Mar 13 09:15:58 2009
New Revision: 5011
Modified:
changes/jat/ihm/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/util/Name.java
Log:
Add additional convenience methods.
Modified: changes/jat/ihm/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/util/Name.java
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Fri Mar 13 08:31:38 2009
New Revision: 5010
Added:
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/SymbolData.java
(contents, props changed)
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/impl/StandardSymbolData.java
(contents, props changed)
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:29 AM, j...@google.com wrote:
LGTM
Thanks or the review. Committed at r5010
If the class names are the same, should it then use other data for a
more complete ordering, and therefore deterministc output?
For the purposes of that comparator, the two class entries
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Fri Mar 13 11:42:58 2009
New Revision: 5014
Added:
releases/1.6/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/EventTarget.java
Modified:
releases/1.6/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImpl.java
releases/1.6/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplIE6.java
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Fri Mar 13 11:37:14 2009
New Revision: 5013
Added:
changes/jat/ihm/user/test/com/google/gwt/dev/util/
changes/jat/ihm/user/test/com/google/gwt/dev/util/NameTest.java
(contents, props changed)
Modified:
21 matches
Mail list logo
