LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1555803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 10662
Author: pengzhu...@google.com
Date: Wed Sep 21 06:39:41 2011
Log: Add a support for header builder to return row index for multi-row
header/footer.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1555803
Review by: jlaba...@google.com
Exactly, your diagnosis matches my expectation. The thing is we do the
precedence detection when first declaring the widget, making sure
that its at least (parentWidget.getPrecedence() + 1). And you're right
that we don't update it when we see a reference. I think that to make
your scheme
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1556803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM with one typo fixed
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1556803/diff/2002/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/PotentialElement.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/PotentialElement.java
(right):
Revision: 10663
Author: acle...@google.com
Date: Wed Sep 21 16:16:57 2011
Log: Enable FF6 Plugin in MissingPlugin Page.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1551803
Review by: rj...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10663
Modified:
Comment by rmattis...@gmail.com:
Unable to initialize a JSR 303 Bean Validator
javax.validation.ValidationException: Unable to find a default provider ???
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation
--
Comment by larse...@gmail.com:
If you don't include a jsr-303 validator, then you'll get this WARNING.
If you want it to go away, you can include the hibernate validator of
versions greater than or equal to 4. I'm unaware of any other 303 bean
validators out there.
Or you could just
