We've considered it, but all of the benefit of DevMode (avoiding recompile)
goes out the window. If you change code, you have to recompile, so the whole
edit-refresh cycle takes a lot longer.
If you really just want source-level debugging of compiled GWT apps, this
can be done with SourceMaps:
And doing continuation transformations for loop constructs is extra difficult.
One possibility is to just use Rhino/HtmlUnit for everything and proxy
all browser API calls, not to an emulated DOM, but do C++ DOM IDL
bindings. This is sort of like Python-WebKit/Pyjamas. So we don't
emulate the
Revision: 10679
Author: acle...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 4 01:08:31 2011
Log: Firefox 7 xulrunner Darwin gcc3
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10679
Added:
/plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-7.0.0/Darwin-gcc3
Revision: 10680
Author: acle...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 4 01:20:51 2011
Log: Firefox 7 libxpcomglue_s.a for Mac
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10680
Added:
/plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-7.0.0/Darwin-gcc3/lib/libxpcomglue_s.a
Hi,
After I switched to GWT 2.3 I suddenly have a custom annotation that fails
to compile with the Oracle javac
I'm totally puzzled on how this can happen but maybe the GWT team have some
insight on what might me happening in GWT
that could cause this ? could this be caused by a
Revision: 10681
Author: acle...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 4 02:13:50 2011
Log: Removed unneeded files from Firefox 7 x86 plugin sdk
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10681
Deleted:
/plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-7.0.0/Linux_x86-gcc3/include/nsAlgorithm.h
Revision: 10682
Author: acle...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 4 02:15:10 2011
Log: Firefox 7 x86 Linux plugin SDK
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10682
Added:
/plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-7.0.0/Linux_x86_64-gcc3
Revision: 10683
Author: acle...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 4 02:17:41 2011
Log: Firefox 7 Windows Plugin SDK
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10683
Added:
/plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-7.0.0/WINNT_x86-msvc
Revision: 10684
Author: acle...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 4 02:31:04 2011
Log: Add missing Firefox 7 common include/ns*.h
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10684
Added:
/plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-7.0.0/include/nsAlgorithm.h
Reviewers: conroy,
Description:
Firefox 7 DevMode Plugin
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1560803/
Affected files:
M plugins/xpcom/Makefile
M plugins/xpcom/VisualStudio/FirefoxPlugins.sln
A plugins/xpcom/VisualStudio/ff70-xpcom.vcproj
M
LGTM.
Tried it in Firefox 7.0.1 on Ubuntu 11.04 x86_64.
Thanks a lot!
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1560803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Comment by dahl...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Is anyone can help me ?
I import this project below from svn site :
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/samples/dynatablerf/
and I try to configure my gwt-maven-plug and eclipse environment to run the
project
after that , I
Comment by dahl...@gmail.com:
Hello, Is anyone can help me ?
I import a example project from the svn site :
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/samples/dynatablerf/ .
and I try to configure my gwt-maven-plugin and eclipse environment to run
the project.
after
Comment by dahl...@gmail.com:
Hello, Can anyone help me ?
I import a example project from the svn site :
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/samples/dynatablerf/ .
and I try to configure my gwt-maven-plugin and eclipse environment to run
the project.
after
Do you actually use DevMode? :) It's really slow as it is,
especially if you make heavy use of RPC. Granted, it's orders of
magnitude faster than doing even a -draftCompile, but the benefit
starts to wear away the more frequently you have to hit F5.
And the general plugin problem is pretty big
I meant to comment; this would all be a lot simpler if GWT-RPC could
serialize final fields as the default/only behavior (basically remove
any configuration variables to turn it on/off).
I understand this isn't viable for the next release, as it's a breaking
change, and users might be putting
Comment by alexpor...@gmail.com:
Regarding Categories:
This is probably loosely implied by the definition of simple autobean
interfaces, but it may be worth noting that category methods do not seem to
work if they begin with the phrase get, as it seems like it causes the
decoder to try
Comment by alexpor...@gmail.com:
Regarding Categories:
This is probably loosely implied by the definition of simple autobean
interfaces, but it may be worth noting that category methods do not seem to
work if they begin with the phrase get, as it seems like it causes the
decoder to try
Reviewers: skybrian,
Description:
Segregate JRE Resource tests for more targeted testing
Review by: skybr...@google.com
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1561804/
Affected files:
A user/test/com/google/gwt/resources/ResourcesJreSuite.java
M
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1561804/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Not really practical.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:35 AM, stephen.haber...@gmail.com wrote:
I meant to comment; this would all be a lot simpler if GWT-RPC could
serialize final fields as the default/only behavior (basically remove
any configuration variables to turn it on/off).
I understand
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1560803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1560803/diff/3001/plugins/xpcom/Makefile
File plugins/xpcom/Makefile (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1560803/diff/3001/plugins/xpcom/Makefile#newcode125
plugins/xpcom/Makefile:125: ifeq ($(BROWSER),ff70)
so, i'm responsible for starting the
Reviewers: rjrjr,
Description:
Add stub support for AutoBeanFactorySource to GWT emul code.
Allows generation of factories in shared GWT/Java code:
GWT.isClient() ? GWT.create(Factory.class)
: AutoBeanFactorySource.create(Factory.class);
Review by: rj...@google.com
Please review this at
24 matches
Mail list logo
