Re: [gwt-contrib] GwtEvent.setSource visibility

+1 2011/5/17 Ray Ryan rj...@google.com Yes please, we shouldn't have broken existing code like that. On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Stephen Haberman stephen.haber...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, With the bindery package change, I have a custom EventBus implementation that no longer

Re: [gwt-contrib] Activities Places

Thanks!! 2011/5/25 A. Stevko andy.ste...@gmail.com Thanks. I like it. It makes clearer some of the relationships. On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:43 AM, danieldietrich cafeb...@googlemail.comwrote: Hi, I've drawn an informal map about Activities Places - perhaps it is helpful for

Re: [gwt-contrib] Any interest in having css3pie integrated with GWT?

+1 2011/9/28 Jeff Larsen larse...@gmail.com To be blunt, Trying to get styling to work right in IE is somewhat of a nightmare. Especially with the lack of css3 support. There is a library out there that fixes some of the major headaches css3pie. http://css3pie.com/ border-radius,

Re: [gwt-contrib] Change in gwt[master]: removes block splitting logic that was specific to IE6/7

Please, don't remove IE7 support. 2013/4/18 Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change. Change subject: removes block splitting logic that was specific to IE6/7 ..**..**.. Patch Set 1:

[gwt-contrib] GWT presentations

Hi all, I saw presentations in the page are very old. How we can improve that? http://www.gwtproject.org/presentations.html Regards -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT presentations

Thanks! 2013/5/28 Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com You can pull gwt-site from gwt.googlesource.com and then update https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt-site/+/master/src/main/markdown/presentations.md Finally push your changes to Gerrit for review.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Google GWT team meeting notes for June 26th

Thanks for sharing! 2013/6/27 Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.com Hi, in the interest of increased transparency, I'm going to start posting notes from GWT team meetings at Google. I'm not sure if we'll keep this up but we'll see how it goes. (My apologies in advance for any errors.) June

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Reminder: Branching GWT 2.6 later today

Thanks Mathew! 2013/11/5 Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com In the mean time though, I think I successfully pushed 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT to https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/google-snapshots/. On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.comwrote: As promised, I

Re: [gwt-contrib] Rebinding Methods improvement proposal and working prototype

Thanks Andrés! Great work 2013/11/28 Andrés Testi andres.a.te...@gmail.com The last 3 months I have been working on a GWT Improvement Proposal inspired by the idea of Ray Cromwell for Relaxing constraints on

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.6.0-rc3

Thanks Colin, it seems this parameter disable some performance improvements: GWT attempts to load pre-compiled GWT module archives (.gwtar files) to increase performance. Consequently, building GWT examples shipped with this release fails with the IBM implementations of the Java Developement Kit

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.6.0-rc3

Thanks for the link Thomas, but as you said was updated in 2010. HostedMode appears in http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideCompilingAndDebugging.html at the section Development Mode Options. 2013/12/7 Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com On Saturday, December 7, 2013 12:52:12 AM

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.6.0-rc3

Thanks Thomas! 2013/12/8 Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com On Sunday, December 8, 2013 2:12:31 PM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote: On Saturday, December 7, 2013 7:42:42 PM UTC+1, juan_pablo_gardella wrote: HostedMode appears in http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.6.0-rc3

at 5:28 PM, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Thomas! 2013/12/8 Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com On Sunday, December 8, 2013 2:12:31 PM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote: On Saturday, December 7, 2013 7:42:42 PM UTC+1, juan_pablo_gardella wrote: HostedMode

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Next Contributor Hangout

Thanks for sharing! Great work guys 2014-02-11 19:05 GMT-03:00 Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com: Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PzpQg51uno On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Bhaskar Janakiraman bjanakira...@google.com wrote: Recorded session is now on-line. Bhaskar On Friday,

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: SDM -XcompilePerFile: initial feedback

Great news!! Thanks a lot for the effort. On 29 August 2014 13:02, Ivan Markov ivan.mar...@gmail.com wrote: BTW using a more recent laptop seems to make a difference and nearly doubles the performance: MacBook Pro model 2013 (I7 2.7 GHz): - 2 to 3 seconds for recompiling changes to a single

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 requiring Java7 for development - Action needed

Java7 is fine for development On 11 September 2014 15:13, Koen Maes k...@koma.be wrote: Java7 is just fine for me... On Thursday, September 11, 2014 7:50:53 PM UTC+2, Daniel Kurka wrote: Hi all, while bringing GSS support into GWT, I discovered that the closure styleheets compiler

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 : precompile and incremental flags

Thanks for sharing Jérémie. Good to know. On 21 October 2014 09:32, Jérémie Gottero jeremiegott...@gmail.com wrote: Do we have an easy way to exclude these folders to see if it improves things? Quick and dirty: I overrode the descendToFindResources method to exclude .svn files (note that

Re: [gwt-contrib] How to include changesets to an existing gerrit review?

' and this will update the review. On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've started a gerrit review and I have to add to add some improvements due some review observations. How I can include the changes in the same gerrit review

[gwt-contrib] How to include changesets to an existing gerrit review?

Hi all, I've started a gerrit review and I have to add to add some improvements due some review observations. How I can include the changes in the same gerrit review? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe

[gwt-contrib] com.google.gwt.dev.SourceSaver cannot be compiled with java6

Hi team, I've just imported gwt-dev in Eclipse and I saw there is only one class that doesn't compile: *com.google.gwt.dev.SourceSaver*: line 213:try (InputStream resourceAsStream = Resources.asByteSource(resource).openStream(); OutputStream out = dest.openForWrite(destPrefix +

Re: [gwt-contrib] com.google.gwt.dev.SourceSaver cannot be compiled with java6

:38 PM, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi team, I've just imported gwt-dev in Eclipse and I saw there is only one class that doesn't compile: *com.google.gwt.dev.SourceSaver*: line 213:try (InputStream resourceAsStream = Resources.asByteSource(resource

[gwt-contrib] Open reviews

Hi contributors, I would like to thanks for your great work and for the passion that you put on GWT. I know you are very busy but it's frustrating to spend time in some patch and then nothing happen. There are a lot of open reviews https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/q/status:open. That kind of

Re: [gwt-contrib] Open reviews

. If the patch falls outside a reviewer's domain then they can transfer it to someone else. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi contributors, I would like to thanks for your great work and for the passion that you put on GWT. I know

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Upcoming overhaul to JsInterop annotations in preparation towards v1.0 release

Why export is defaulted to false? On 19 May 2015 at 19:21, 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote: Here is the comparison chart: @JsExport @JsType class MyClass {} @JsType(exports=ALL) class MyClass {} @JsExport class MyClass

[gwt-contrib] Git rebase

Hi contributors, I did a commit (A) and pushed the changes to be reviewed. After that I did some pulls and merges locally. Then my history contains the merge M: M | \ B | | / A I completed my changes and with some rebase commands I was able to have: A | B But when I tried to push the

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Git rebase

My author is correct, but after the rebase the error is related to a commit that I'm not owner. I had to pull the repository again and fetch my changes again, after that, I made the changes and pushed them. I don't know how to solve that without pull the full repository again. On 24 June 2015 at

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Git rebase

Thanks a lot Jens, I will do that in my next contribution. On 24 June 2015 at 07:35, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote: My author is correct, but after the rebase the error is related to a commit that I'm not owner. I had to pull the repository again and fetch my changes again, after that,

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 Release

Great work! Thanks. Is there any release note to GWT 2.8? On 23 October 2015 at 01:55, 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors < google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com> wrote: > In the last few months, we had important progress on JsInterop and finally > it looks like we will be able to

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0-beta1 available for testing

It will be very useful to make gwt-servlet compatible with java 6 On 4 December 2015 at 17:41, Jens wrote: > > Is it intentional/necessary that gwt-servlet.jar is compiled for Java 7 >> and not Java 6? >> > > gwt-servlet.jar isn't really compiled, its just assembled.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.0-beta1 available for testing

Hi contributors, I've created a google doc with full GWT 2.8.0 release notes. It's divided by features/components and links for each commit. I didn't put reverted commits, and fixes over features like JSInterop. Everyone can put comments. It could be added later at GWT

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Plugin v3.0 and tbroyer maven integration ?

Did you check if it works by putting in Application.gwt.xml in src/main/java instead of src/main/resources? On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 at 06:48 stuckagain wrote: > > Living behind a corporate firewall is hell as I cannot get my hands on the > GWT plugin (I have a support case

Re: [gwt-contrib] Last call for GWT 2.8.2 patches, and testers needed!

How can I contribute to test? On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 at 07:28 Colin Alworth wrote: > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [gwt-contrib] Testing GWT 2.9.0 for release

Hi Colin, Could you please share the spreadsheet again? Juan On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 23:43, Colin Alworth wrote: > Hi all, > We have a build ready to test for GWT 2.9.0, and are looking for > volunteers to verify that things are behaving properly on a variety of > platforms. If you have an

Re: [gwt-contrib] Testing GWT 2.9.0 for release

I verified GWT 2.9.0-RC1 in one of my applications without issues. The tests I could not complete due an ant issues to build the samples. Juan On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 22:01, Colin Alworth wrote: > We're having an issue related to the java7->java8 update, the build isn't > properly including the

Re: [gwt-contrib] Resolving cycle dependency between gwt-safehtml & gwt-safecss

+1 to merge them. It seems the simplest solution. On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 17:23, Colin Alworth wrote: > One potential option could be moving the tests into gwt-safecss, and only > release them together - the release process through sonatype will permit > you to push more than one set of

Re: [gwt-contrib] Resolving cycle dependency between gwt-safehtml & gwt-safecss

Not too much options I think, see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55429921/how-to-fix-cyclic-dependency-between-java-modules Maybe a new common shared module (maven artifact in this case) or merge safehtml and safecss into a new one and let them deprecated. Juan On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.10 release?

@co...@colinalworth.com do yo know any ETA on this? On Tue, Oct 12, 2021, 5:28 AM Rocco De Angelis wrote: > > Nice +1 > chani...@gmail.com schrieb am Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 um 16:38:08 UTC+2: > >> Thank a millon, looks great ! +1 >> >> On Friday, October 1, 2021 at 2:55:21 p.m. UTC-4

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Goodbye IE 8–9 

+1 drop IE 11 increases the effort to include new stuff. IE +11 can still use GWT 2.9.0 On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 16:55, Vegegoku wrote: > I vote to even drop support for IE11. > > On Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 7:49:56 PM UTC+3 nilo...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> I've just filed

Re: [gwt-contrib] gwtproject.org migration, https support

Thanks Colin! Great work On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 12:37 PM Colin Alworth wrote: > We've successfully migrated the gwtproject.org website to a new domain > name server and new hosting, at Google's request. There are a few small > differences from the old hosting: > > >- HTTPS is now supported

Re: [gwt-contrib] Preliminary testing for GWT 2.10 release

I tested and I updated from net.ltgt.gwt.maven:gwt-maven-plugin:1.0.0 to net.ltgt.gwt.maven:gwt-maven-plugin:1.0.1 in order to see the proper error (* Value 'ie10' in not a valid value for property 'user.agent'*) instead of [1]. After that I see following error: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal

Re: [gwt-contrib] Preliminary testing for GWT 2.10 release

Tried with Maven 3.8.5 and still fails with same issue. Reported at https://github.com/tbroyer/gwt-maven-plugin/issues/152 On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 3:59 PM Colin Alworth wrote: > I've pushed a new build with version 2.10.0-new-groupid-3 that has several > @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")s added,

Re: [gwt-contrib] Preliminary testing for GWT 2.10 release

After removing an old plexus-utils as suggested at #152 , I was able to compile and run the application without issues so far. Great work! On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 2:25 PM Freddy Boucher wrote: > 2.10.0-new-groupid-3 works like a charm (in

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Testing for GWT 2.10.0 release

Thanks Colin! On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 5:11 PM Colin Alworth wrote: > The last step of the release process is under way, Google's 2.10.0 release > is underway, we're just waiting for the release to be performed and > synchronized to Maven Central. When that has finished we can formally >

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Preparing for GWT 2.11 release

Hello, is gwt-2.11 artifacts available somewhere for testing against the applications I am currently working on? On Tue, Nov 14, 2023, 11:37 PM Colin Alworth wrote: > It has taken longer than we had hoped, but I think we're just about ready > - GWT itself can build on Java 17 (and can run on

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Preparing for GWT 2.11 release

ange > should be in the javadoc output. The build produced from Java8 is > substantially smaller since it doesn't include javadoc at all, since the > APIs we now use are not compatible there. > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 7:36:55 AM UTC-6 Juan Pablo Gardella > wrot