Hi Brian, thanks for the feedback!
What you proposes is not so hard to add, but I want the API end users to
not have to deal with GWT.create() at all.
El lunes, 19 de agosto de 2013 19:18:24 UTC-3, Brian Slesinsky escribió:
Interesting. I like the idea of replacing class parameters with
Interesting. I like the idea of replacing class parameters with something
else. I'm not sure we need to sweep the implementation under the rug.
Particularly in fancier scenarios, it might be easier to work with it
explicitly.
Suppose we have:
/** Encapsulates a GWT create call. */
interface
Thank Ray :-)
The patch has as an issue with constructor code-gen that I solved, but GIT
doesn't allows me to push merges.
Of course, has you a link to explore the javac compiler-plugin alternative?
Thanks!
- Andrés
El sábado, 17 de agosto de 2013 01:28:53 UTC-3, Ray Cromwell escribió:
BTW consider that I forgot to commit @GwtCreate annotation, you can find it
here: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/4111/
Where I wrote Further Improvements, I meant Upcoming Improvements (I'm
not native english speaker)
- Andrés
--
I've been working on a prototype inspired by Ray Cromwell's proposal for
@GwtCreate parameters, borrowing some ideas from Scala implicit macros. I
apologize for not to post this in the Possible GWT.create() Improvements
thread, but this message is too long to be only a comment.
You can check
I've been working on a prototype inspired by Ray Cromwell's proposal for
@GwtCreate parameters, borrowing some ideas from Scala implicit macros. I
apologize for not to post this in the Possible GWT.create() Improvements
thread, but this message is too long to be only a comment.
You can check
Andres, this looks amazing! I've been out this week on vacation but
returning tomorrow, I'll take a look when I return.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Andrés Testi andres.a.te...@gmail.comwrote:
I've been working on a prototype inspired by Ray Cromwell's proposal for
@GwtCreate parameters,
