Re: Caution: SmartGwt loadup size is big

2010-07-22 Thread Nirmal
Any experiences on performance/download size with GWT Mosaic??


Regards,
Nirmal

On Jul 22, 9:15 am, Shawn Brown big.coffee.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
  Is GXT any different in this aspect? Does it support code-splitting? (Unless
  it is only an alias of one of those you mentioned.)

 Yes it does.

 http://things-that-i-noticed.blogspot.com/2010/07/gxt-mvc-code-splitt...

 Shawn

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Caution: SmartGwt loadup size is big

2010-07-21 Thread Shawn Brown
 Is GXT any different in this aspect? Does it support code-splitting? (Unless
 it is only an alias of one of those you mentioned.)

Yes it does.

http://things-that-i-noticed.blogspot.com/2010/07/gxt-mvc-code-splitting-on-gae-appengine.html

Shawn

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Caution: SmartGwt loadup size is big

2010-07-15 Thread Stefan Bachert
Hi,

this is the major problem using a javascript wrapper instead of a real
GWT based library.
However, even a poor designed GWT library may  (but should not) run
into this problem due to poor dependencies.
(Everthing depends on everthing)


Stefan Bachert
http://gwtworld.de

On 15 Jul., 01:22, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
 We have a tiny widget from SmartClient's SmartGwt. And it had
 increased the intial loadup size between webserver and browser by 2.3MB
 +.( js, css)

 Thus be cautious if you think this can hamper performance.

 (If anybody has solution to above than plz share ).

 FYI: We do changed header of script to cache all SmartClient's scripts
 forever.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Caution: SmartGwt loadup size is big

2010-07-15 Thread lineman78
SmartGWT is only a GWT wrapper on a javascript library so it is
expected that you would have this problem.  If you can stand the
licensing, GXT is supposed to be a pure GWT implementation of their
javascript library, so unused portions of the library are not
included.  Due to licensing I have not used it, so I can't speak to
it's effectiveness.  The best solution would be to try and find a
project that has the specific widget you want without the overhead.

On Jul 14, 5:22 pm, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
 We have a tiny widget from SmartClient's SmartGwt. And it had
 increased the intial loadup size between webserver and browser by 2.3MB
 +.( js, css)

 Thus be cautious if you think this can hamper performance.

 (If anybody has solution to above than plz share ).

 FYI: We do changed header of script to cache all SmartClient's scripts
 forever.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Caution: SmartGwt loadup size is big

2010-07-14 Thread Roger Studner
SmartGWT or ExtJS(gwt-ext, ext-gwt) etc.. all have this issue.

I'd like one tiny tiny feature.

here are your 1000+ files.

Thanks!

Roger

On Jul 14, 2010, at 7:22 PM, mk wrote:

 We have a tiny widget from SmartClient's SmartGwt. And it had
 increased the intial loadup size between webserver and browser by 2.3MB
 +.( js, css)
 
 Thus be cautious if you think this can hamper performance.
 
 (If anybody has solution to above than plz share ).
 
 FYI: We do changed header of script to cache all SmartClient's scripts
 forever.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Caution: SmartGwt loadup size is big

2010-07-14 Thread Jaroslav Záruba
Is GXT any different in this aspect? Does it support code-splitting? (Unless
it is only an alias of one of those you mentioned.)

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Roger Studner rstud...@gmail.com wrote:

 SmartGWT or ExtJS(gwt-ext, ext-gwt) etc.. all have this issue.

 I'd like one tiny tiny feature.

 here are your 1000+ files.

 Thanks!

 Roger

 On Jul 14, 2010, at 7:22 PM, mk wrote:

  We have a tiny widget from SmartClient's SmartGwt. And it had
  increased the intial loadup size between webserver and browser by 2.3MB
  +.( js, css)
 
  Thus be cautious if you think this can hamper performance.
 
  (If anybody has solution to above than plz share ).
 
  FYI: We do changed header of script to cache all SmartClient's scripts
  forever.
 
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
  To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
 .
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
 

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.