Bleah. I'd very much prefer if the situation never came up. Anyway,
gossip is a special case, as I am the list maintainer. The important
point is I don't exert editorial control over (archives of) lists that
I do not maintain.
Jeff
> some way of deleting spam ads seems to be a good idea.
>
> Yes, but...
>
> * I can't delete the spam myself.
> * Editing archives may cause legal problems for the service.
excellent point. how could i forget?
i forgot the names (AOL and CompuServe?) the t
Last night mail-archive.com upgraded its internal software,
to version 1.3.4. The new software sports
* Improved logging
The new logs are syslogd based, split into trouble/activity, and are
self trimming. Thanks to Albert Langer for the suggestion.
So why do you care? Because the logs are now
Tomoyuki,
some way of deleting spam ads seems to be a good idea.
Yes, but...
* I can't delete the spam myself.
* Editing archives may cause legal problems for the service.
* I'd prefer not to give out unix logins for this.
* The best place for blocking spam is at the list server.
* Ad
> EXCITING "DO-ABLE" HOME BASED BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY
> Dear Friend:
> Are you tired of living "paycheck to paycheck"? Are
> you looking for a way to earn extra money in your spare
--- deleting spam ads in archives.
some way of deleting spam ads seems
