Re: Interpretation of issue status "RESOLVED" (Re: Issues, meta-issues and transparency)

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Roach
This is still the wrong list for this conversation. You have now been told twice. /a > On Oct 15, 2016, at 17:05, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > >> On 2016-10-08 15:17, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >>> On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote: >>>2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org

Discussion forum (Re: Interpretation of issue status "RESOLVED" (Re: Issues, meta-issues and transparency))

2016-10-16 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Hi Adam, I addressed this thread to both governance@ and bugmast...@lists.mozilla.org. The initiator of this sub-thread dropped bugmasters, possibly involuntarily. For my part, I merely retitled the sub-thread. The initiator has already announced that his contribution to this thread was over.

Interpretation of issue status "RESOLVED" (Re: Issues, meta-issues and transparency)

2016-10-15 Thread Filipus Klutiero
On 2016-10-08 15:17, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote: 2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org allows tickets to be marked as both WONTFIX and resolved In Bugzilla, a bug can be in multiple states that indicate what work remains to be done on