Laurel,
I see Encryption of data at rest (stipulation of the GPC Agreement) – how are
sites handing this? in today's agenda. What's the source of that item? Which
GPC Agreement?
--
Dan
___
Gpc-dev mailing list
Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
No, we don't need (separate) discussion of
#31https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/31: data elements
for ALS. It's subsumed by what you have under
#176https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/176: Implement
data validation and quality approaches.
--
Dan
On 10/21/2014 09:52 AM, Verhagen, Laurel A wrote:
After writing the agenda, I received the following from Steve Fennel:
1)How will GPC data in motion be protected? /All data in motion will
be encrypted. Specially, data files will be sent via SCP.
Alternatively, if the application involves
Which direction is that? pointer, please?
--
Dan
From: Verhagen, Laurel A [verhagen.lau...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 10:21 AM
To: Dan Connolly
Cc: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
Subject: RE: encryption at rest?
Direction was that gpc hosted
Dan: from our call with Steve and two lawyers on 10/17: GPC Hosted Services =
suite of software that exists at all sites.
Not true?
Thanks,
Laurel
From: Dan Connolly [mailto:dconno...@kumc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 10:24 AM
To: Verhagen, Laurel A
Cc: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
The pcornet-cdm1-parseable.xlsx addendum to CDM 1.x was very useful for our
review etc.
Should we expect something similar for CDM 2.x? An ETA would help me decide
whether to just parse the tables in the Word doc like I originally did for 1.x.
ref:
I haven't read the whole thing, but I just noticed this (emphasis mine):
3.3 Comments on Protected Health Information (PHI)
The CDM will contain some of the 18 elements that define PHI under HIPAA,
including encounter dates and date of birth. However, these dates will remain
under the control
I will need to bring this up with the steering committee
Russ Waitman
On Oct 21, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Dan Connolly
dconno...@kumc.edumailto:dconno...@kumc.edu wrote:
I haven't read the whole thing, but I just noticed this (emphasis mine):
3.3 Comments on Protected Health Information (PHI)
WISC is having technical issues - here's a google
dochttps://docs.google.com/document/d/19VwtMX3n7EPLmWcG0_X_T5LfQJ3ycz1B13MUJnh0Io0/edit?usp=sharing
for notes.
From: gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu
[mailto:gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] On Behalf Of Verhagen, Laurel A
Sent: Monday,
Notes from 10/21/2014:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hSiE2RVDU8dDYPlpSmmVnrlJXF6nP0b9XBJ36ZJKRCI/edit
I didn't catch the final disposition of #8. Can someone help fill me in?
-Tom Mish
___
Gpc-dev mailing list
Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
#182: Complete LOINC standardization of CDM V1 and share metadata with GPC
-+-
Reporter: campbell| Owner: hickman
Type: | Status: new
enhancement| Milestone: morning-star
#87: Deploy, document R Data Builder demo service
--+
Reporter: dconnolly | Owner: dconnolly
Type: task | Status: accepted
Priority: major | Milestone: data-agg1
Component: data-sharing | Resolution:
12 matches
Mail list logo
