I'm getting KUMC's secure encrypted attachment notice when I sent the
XLS file with the updated empirical data dictionary.
There is nothing sensitive in the attachment, I don't know what
triggered this. I'm tempted to zip the file and re-send it to the list.
Is there any reason (Dan, Russ) I
Thanks, Bonnie. Here are some initial thoughts by UTHSCSA using your feedback
template on CDM v2 (including a few questions on CDM v1 fields).
Angela Bos
Clinical Informatics Research Division
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
UT Health Science Center at San Antonio
Phone: (210)
Yes, it's good to get these details nailed down, Phillip.
The GPC standard for demographics has never been quite baked. We have never
closed #67https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/67. Yes, I
hope we can converge on what Hubert uploads, and I hope he uploads it soon. I
didn't
I'm not in a good position to judge; I guess I'd recommend a conservative
approach: upload to PCORNet CDT and send a pointer to gpc-dev.
--
Dan
From: gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu [gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] on
behalf of Alex Bokov
All,
This afternoon I got up to speed on visit types. I have several dozen
questions that may be relevant for this discussion. I could probably spend
some time throwing a query together, but I'd prefer to ask the questions before
helping with a query since it would get complicated quickly.
Note, I'm only considering the standard release range category values for
EPT-30 in this message.
Does last visit need to have some human contact (either physical or via phone
or electronic communication)?
Since visits in i2b2 are generally captured with a provider (unless you're
doing
#182: Complete LOINC standardization of CDM V1 and share metadata with GPC
-+-
Reporter: campbell | Owner: huhickman
Type: enhancement | Status:
