Hi Folks
I was asked by Doris Conti to send the below to our Spectrum Scale User
group.
Below is a consolidated link that list all the enablement on Spectrum
Scale/ESS that was done in 1H 2017 - which have blogs and videos from
development and offering management.
https://www.ibm.com/developer
There isn't a "recommended" efix as such. Generally, fixes go into the
next ptf so that they go through a test cycle. If a customer hits a
serious issue that cannot wait for the next ptf, they can request an efix
be built, but since efixes do not get the same level of rigorous testing as
a ptf, t
Correct they some from IBM support.
The AFM issue we have (and is fixed in the efix) is if you have client
code running on the AFM cache that uses truncate. The AFM write coalescing
processing does something funny with it, so the file isn't truncated and
then the data you write afterwards isn't co
Efixes (in my one time only limited experience!) come direct from IBM as a
result of a PMR.
Richard
-Original Message-
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
[mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of John Hearns
Sent: 29 September 2017 10:02
To: gpfsug main
Simon,
I would appreciate a heads up on that AFM issue.
I upgraded to 4.2.3.4 this morning, to deal with an AFM issue, which is if a
remote NFS mount goes down then an asynchronous operation such as a read can be
stopped.
I must admit to being not clued up on how the efixes are distributed. I
d
