Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Not recommended, but why not?

2018-05-07 Thread Bryan Banister
Sure, many ways to solve the same problem, just depends on where you want to have the controls. Having a separate VLAN doesn't give you as fine grained controls over each network workload you are using, such as metrics collection, monitoring, GPFS, SSH, NFS vs SMB, vs Object, etc. But it

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Not recommended, but why not?

2018-05-07 Thread Buterbaugh, Kevin L
Hi All, I want to thank all of you who took the time to respond to this question … your thoughts / suggestions are much appreciated. What I’m taking away from all of this is that it is OK to run CES on NSD servers as long as you are very careful in how you set things up. This would include:

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] CES NFS export

2018-05-07 Thread Chetan R Kulkarni
Make sure NFSv4 ID Mapping value matches on client and server. On server side (i.e. CES nodes); you can set as below: $ mmnfs config change IDMAPD_DOMAIN=test.com On client side (e.g. RHEL NFS client); one can set it using Domain attribute in /etc/idmapd.conf file. $ egrep ^Domain