> My understanding, after talking to expert people here, is that I should use the RFC2307 model for ID mapping (described here: https://goo.gl/XvqHDH). The problem is
> that our ID schema is slightly different than that one described in RFC2307. In the RFC the relevant user identification fields
> Basically Samba ignores the separate GID field in RFC2307bis, so one> imagines the options for changing the LDAP attributes are none> existent.
mmuserauth now has an option to use either the gid from the actual primarygroup or the gid defined for the user. See:
You can change them using the normal SMB commands, from the appropriate bin
directory, whether this is supported is another matter.
We have one parameter set this way but I forgot which.
Simkn
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 03:46:32PM +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 14:16 +, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> > I haven't needed to change the LDAP attributes that CES uses, but I
> > do see --user-id-attrib in the mmuserauth documentation.
> > Unfortunately, I don't see an
On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 14:16 +, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> I haven't needed to change the LDAP attributes that CES uses, but I
> do see --user-id-attrib in the mmuserauth documentation.
> Unfortunately, I don't see an equivalent one for gidNumber.
>
Is it not doing the "Samba thing" where your
I haven't needed to change the LDAP attributes that CES uses, but I do see
--user-id-attrib in the mmuserauth documentation. Unfortunately, I don't
see an equivalent one for gidNumber.
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:45:00AM +, Dorigo Alvise (PSI) wrote:
> Dear members,
> at PSI I'm trying to
Hi all,
We currently have an issue with our GPFS clusters.
Shortly when we removed/added a node to a cluster we changed IP
address for the IPoIB subnet and this broke GPFS. The primary IP
didn't change.
In details our setup is quite standard: one GPFS cluster with CPU
nodes only accessing (via
Dear members,
at PSI I'm trying to integrate the CES service with our AD authentication
system.
My understanding, after talking to expert people here, is that I should use the
RFC2307 model for ID mapping (described here: https://goo.gl/XvqHDH). The
problem is that our ID schema is slightly
