Kevin,
That sounds like a useful script
would you care to share?
Thanks
Andrew Beattie
Software Defined Storage - IT Specialist
Phone: 614-2133-7927
E-mail: abeat...@au1.ibm.com
- Original message -From: "Buterbaugh, Kevin L" Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.orgTo:
Hi All,
Let me answer Skylar’s questions in another e-mail, which may also tell whether
the rest API is a possibility or not.
The Python script in question is to display quota information for a user. The
mmlsquota command has a couple of issues: 1) its output is confusing to some
of our
You could also wrap whatever provisioning script you're using (the thing that
runs mmcrfileset), which must already be running as root, so that it also
updates the cached text file afterward.
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
On Behalf Of Skylar
Hi Kevin,
Have you looked at the rest API?
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/STXKQY_5.0.2/com.ibm.spectrum.scale.v5r02.doc/bl1adm_listofapicommands.htm
I don't know how much access control there is available in the API so not sure
if you could lock some sort of service user down
I suppose you could run the underlying tslsfileset, though that's probably
not the answer you're looking for.
Out of curiousity, what are you hoping to gain by not running mmlsfileset?
Is the problem scaling due to the number of filesets that you have defined?
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:12:22PM
Hi All,
Happy New Year to all! Personally, I’ll gladly and gratefully settle for 2019
not being a dumpster fire like 2018 was (those who attended my talk at the user
group meeting at SC18 know what I’m referring to), but I certainly wish all of
you the best!
Is there a way to get a list of
We use realmd and some automation for sssd configs to get linux hosts to have
local login and ssh tied to AD accounts, however we do not apply these configs
on our protocol nodes.
From: on behalf of Christof Schmitt
Reply-To: gpfsug main discussion list
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at
ST>I believe socket based licenses are also about to or already no longer
available
ST>for new customers (existing customers can continue to buy).
ST>Carl can probably comment on this?
That is correct. Friday Jan 11 is the last chance for *new* customers to buy
Standard Edition sockets.
There is the PAM module that would forward authentication requests to winbindd:
/usr/lpp/mmfs/lib64/security/pam_gpfs-winbind.so
In theory that can be added to the PAM configuration in /etc/pam.d/. On the other hand, we have never tested this nor claimed support, so there might be reasons why this
unning OBJ instead of having them all run both services?If it is possible it would be great to hear pros and cons about doing this ?Thanks in advance!Venlig hilsen / Best RegardsAndi ChristiansenIT Solution Specialist-- next part --An HTML attachment was scrubb
ialist
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss/attachments/20190109/83819399/attachment-0001.html>
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 14:05:48 +
From: "Sanchez, Paul"
ng OBJ instead of having them all run both services?If it is possible it would be great to hear pros and cons about doing this ?Thanks in advance!Venlig hilsen / Best RegardsAndi ChristiansenIT Solution Specialist-- next part --An HTML attachment was scrubbed...URL:
I think only recently was remote cluster support added (though we have been
doing it since CES was released).
I agree that capacity licenses have freed us to implement a better solution..
no longer do we run quorum/token managers on nsd nodes to reduce socket costs.
I believe socket based
The docs say: “CES supports the following export protocols: NFS, SMB, object,
and iSCSI (block). Each protocol can be enabled or disabled in the cluster. If
a protocol is enabled in the CES cluster, all CES nodes serve that protocol.”
Which would seem to indicate that the answer is “no”.
This
Hi Simon,
It was actually also the only solution I found if I want to keep them within
the same cluster
Thanks for the reply, I will see what we figure out !
Venlig hilsen / Best Regards
Andi Rhod Christiansen
Fra: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
På vegne af Simon Thompson
Hi Andrew,
Where can I request such a feature?
Venlig hilsen / Best Regards
Andi Rhod Christiansen
Fra: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
På vegne af Andrew Beattie
Sendt: 9. januar 2019 12:17
Til: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Cc: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Emne: Re:
You have to run all services on all nodes ( ☹ ) actually its technically
possible to remove the packages once protocols is running on the node, but next
time you reboot the node, it will get marked unhealthy and you spend an hour
working out why…
But what we do to split load is have different
Andi,
All the CES nodes in the same cluster will share the same protocol exports
if you want to separate them you need to create remote mount clusters and export the additional protocols via the remote mount
it would actually be a useful RFE to have the ablity to create CES groups attached to
Hi,
I seem to be unable to find any information on separating protocol services on
specific CES nodes within a cluster. Does anyone know if it is possible to
take, lets say 4 of the ces nodes within a cluster and dividing them into two
and have two of the running SMB and the other two running
19 matches
Mail list logo
