Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue

2020-05-09 Thread Jonathan Buzzard
On 09/05/2020 12:06, Jaime Pinto wrote: DNS shouldn't be relied upon on a GPFS cluster for internal communication/management or data. The 1980's have called and want their lack of IP resolution protocols back :-) I would kindly disagree. If your DNS is not working then your cluster is

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue

2020-05-09 Thread Jaime Pinto
DNS shouldn't be relied upon on a GPFS cluster for internal communication/management or data. As a starting point, make sure the IP's and names of all managers/quorum nodes and clients have *unique* entries in the hosts files of all other nodes in the clusters, being the same as how they

[gpfsug-discuss] Odd networking/name resolution issue

2020-05-09 Thread TURNER Aaron
Dear All, We are getting, on an intermittent basis with currently no obvious pattern, an issue with GPFS nodes reporting rejecting nodes of the form: nodename.domain.domain.domain DNS resolution using the standard command-line tools of the IP address present in the logs does not repeat