Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Mmrestripefs -R --metadat-only - how to estimate remaining execution time

Yes Heiner, my experience is that the inode count in those operations is: inodes * snapshots = total. I observed that as it starts processing the snapshot inodes it moves faster as inode usage in snapshots is more sparse. -Eric On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:56 AM Billich Heinrich Rainer (ID SD) <

[gpfsug-discuss] mmchconfig subnets

lly shares that with the cluster? Thanks in advance for your clarifying comments. -Eric -- Eric Horst University of Washington ___ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] gpfs 4.2.3.5 and RHEL 7.4...

Grr, this might explain why I experienced unhappiness when I tried to start my long-delayed AFM based migration over the weekend. I had previously tested AFM and found everything working, but 7.4 may have slipped in last month. The AFM relationship seems to work but `mmafmctl premigrate` commands

[gpfsug-discuss] undo fileset inode allocation

Greetings all, I've been setting up and migrating to a new 225TB filesystem on 4.2.1. Separate data and metadata disks. There are about 20 independent filesets as second level directories which have all the files. One of the independent filesets hit its inode limit of 28M. Without carefully

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] translating /dev device into nsd name

Perhaps this: mmlsnsd -m -Eric On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Aaron Knister wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I'm curious about the most straightforward and fastest way to identify > what NSD a given /dev device is. The best I can come up with is > "tspreparedisk -D

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 3.5 to 4.1 Upgrade Question

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Aaron Knister wrote: > Thanks Eric! > > I have a few follow up questions for you-- > > Do you recall the exact versions of 3.5 and 4.1 your cluster went from/to? > I'm curious to know what version of 4.1 you were at when you ran the >

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 3.5 to 4.1 Upgrade Question

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Aaron Knister wrote: > Also, if anyone has done a rolling 3.5 to 4.1 upgrade and has any > anecdotes they'd like to share, I would like to hear them. > I recently did a rolling upgrade from 3.5 to 4.1 to 4.2 on two different clusters.

[gpfsug-discuss] Using AFM to migrate within the same cluster

situation of needing to transparently move 100M files between two existing filesystems. Thanks, -Eric -- Eric Horst University of Washington ___ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] File_heat for GPFS File Systems

arn by observation. It is easy for one to make an assumption that it is a more dynamic tiering system than it is. -Eric -- Eric Horst University of Washington ___ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss