Not that it answers Stuart's questions in any way, but we gave up on the same
problem on a similar setup, rescued an old fileserver off the scrapheap (RAID6
of 12 x 7.2k rpm SAS on a PERC H710P) and just served the reference data by nfs
- good enough to keep the compute busy rather than in
y's Topics:
1. nfs krb5p performance (Jon Diprose)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:58:02 +
From: Jon Diprose
To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org"
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] nfs kr
Hello,
We have just started using the nfs protocol with SECTYPE=krb5p and are a little
surprised by the performance impact - looks like down to a third of that of
SECTYPE=krb5. Would any of you using krb5p be kind enough to share your
estimates of impact? Not sure if we have a misconfiguration
, not ideal leaving that laying around.
--
Scott Ruffner
Senior HPC Engineer
UVa Research Computing
(434)924-6778(o)
(434)295-0250(h)
sruff...@virginia.edu
On 2/25/21, 5:13 AM, "gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org on behalf of
Jon Diprose" wrote:
I have written an x
I have written an xCAT plugin such that the client can ask the master to do it,
in preparation for some shiny new kit. Not in a public repo yet, so please
email me direct if you want further info.
--
Dr. Jonathan Diprose Tel: 01865 287837
Research Computing Manager
Henry Wellcome
Might it be easier to add gpfs1. and gpfs2. as CNAMEs to your web
proxy / firewall , and then configure the web proxy to select the backend
on the basis of the requested hostname? https://gpfs1./ redirects to
https://gpfs1./gui/ and there's no mucking about with gpfs stuff required
at all.
Dear GPFSUG,
I see the faq says Spectrum Scale is supported on "AMD Opteron based servers".
Does anyone know if/when support will be officially extended to cover AMD Epyc,
especially the new 7002 (Rome) series?
Does anyone have any experience of running Spectrum Scale on Rome they could
