Looks like you have GPFS 4.1.0.4.
If you want to upgrade to V5, please contact DDN support.
I am also not sure if the DDN windows installer supports Win10 yet.
(I work for DDN)
Best Regards,
Vic Cornell
> On 5 Nov 2018, at 20:25, Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)
> wrote:
>
> Hi there
Bump
I can see no reason why that wouldn't work. But it would be nice to a have an
official answer or evidence that it works.
Vic
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 5:49 pm, Brian Marshall wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I see in the GPFS FAQ A6.3 the statement below. Is it possible to have GPFS
> do RDMA over EDR
The annoying answer is "it depends”.
I ran a system with all of the NSDs being visible to all of the NSDs on both
sites and that worked well.
However there are lots of questions to answer:
Where are the clients going to live?
Will you have clients in both sites or just one?
nc DR Development
> IBM Systems
> Bangalore - Embassy Golf Links
> India
>
>
>
>
>
> From:Vic Cornell
> To:gpfsug main discussion list
> Date:04/19/2016 04:34 PM
> Subject:Re: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM Question
> Sent by:
on
>
> SW mode does not support failover. IW does, so this will not work.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Shankar Balasubramanian
> AFM & Async DR Development
> IBM Systems
> Bangalore - Embassy Golf Links
> India
>
>
>
>
>
> From:Vic Cornell
Hi All,
Is there a bandwidth efficient way (downtime is allowed) to reverse the
relationship between HOME and CACHE in a single writer AFM relationship?
If it is not immediately obvious why this might be useful, see the following
scenario:
Fileset A is a GPFS fileset which is acting as CACHE
Simon is right - we are using DMAPI to tier off to WOS our object store and to
StrongBox NAS-fronted tape.
We are very interested in the new “lightweight” protocols as they may allow us
to do stuff that DMAPI makes hard - like tiering off to more than one DMAPI
service from a single filesystem.
