Re: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM over NFS vs GPFS

2016-03-02 Thread Dean Hildebrand
Research Center From: Luke Raimbach <luke.raimb...@crick.ac.uk> To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-disc...@gpfsug.org> Date: 03/01/2016 04:44 AM Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM over NFS vs GPFS Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org HI All, We have

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM over NFS vs GPFS

2016-03-02 Thread Dean Hildebrand
Research Center From: Luke Raimbach <luke.raimb...@crick.ac.uk> To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-disc...@gpfsug.org> Date: 03/01/2016 04:44 AM Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM over NFS vs GPFS Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org HI All, We have

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] AFM over NFS vs GPFS

2016-03-02 Thread Luke Raimbach
Anybody know the answer? > HI All, > > We have two clusters and are using AFM between them to compartmentalise > performance. We have the opportunity to run AFM over GPFS protocol (over IB > verbs), which I would imagine gives much greater performance than trying to > push it over NFS over

[gpfsug-discuss] AFM over NFS vs GPFS

2016-03-01 Thread Luke Raimbach
HI All, We have two clusters and are using AFM between them to compartmentalise performance. We have the opportunity to run AFM over GPFS protocol (over IB verbs), which I would imagine gives much greater performance than trying to push it over NFS over Ethernet. We will have a whole raft of