Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS(snapshot, backup) vs. GPFS(backup scripts) vs. TSM(backup)

OK, that is good to know. I'll give it a try with snapshot then. We already have 3.5 almost everywhere, and planing for 4.2 upgrade (reading the posts with interest) Thanks Jaime Quoting Yuri L Volobuev : Under both 3.2 and 3.3 mmbackup would always lock up our

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS(snapshot, backup) vs. GPFS(backup scripts) vs. TSM(backup)

y...@il.ibm.com IBM Israel gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org wrote on 03/09/2016 09:56:13 PM: From: Jaime Pinto <pi...@scinet.utoronto.ca> To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> Date: 03/09/2016 09:56 PM Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS(snaps

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS(snapshot, backup) vs. GPFS(backup scripts) vs. TSM(backup)

/09/2016 09:56:13 PM: > From: Jaime Pinto <pi...@scinet.utoronto.ca> > To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> > Date: 03/09/2016 09:56 PM > Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS(snapshot, backup) vs. GPFS(backup > scripts) vs. TSM(backup) >

[gpfsug-discuss] GPFS(snapshot, backup) vs. GPFS(backup scripts) vs. TSM(backup)

Here is another area where I've been reading material from several sources for years, and in fact trying one solution over the other from time-to-time in a test environment. However, to date I have not been able to find a one-piece-document where all these different IBM alternatives for