Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

hen replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> > than "Re: Contents of gpfsug-discuss digest..." >> > >> > >> > Today's Topics: >> > >> >1. Re: storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale (Harol

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

nts of gpfsug-discuss digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > >1. Re: storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale (Harold Morales) > >2. Re: storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale (Glen Corneau) > > > > > > ------------------

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

en from > node-to-node. > > The main thing to keep in mind is to keep the file system definitions in > sync between the source and destination clusters. The "syncFSconfig" user > exit is the best way to do it because it's automatic. You generally > shouldn't

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> > Date:01/26/2018 12:30 PM > Subject:Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for > Spectrum Scale > Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org > -- &

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

From: Harold Morales <hmora...@optimizeit.co> To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> Date: 01/26/2018 12:30 PM Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrums

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

pectrumscale.org [mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Jan-Frode MyklebustSent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 8:08 AMTo: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale Have you seen https://w

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

uss@spectrumscale.org> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale John, yes, they definitely can! Nodes in a remote cluster are tob viewed just as local nodes in terms of taking part in the mechanisms of access to data. Token management will be done just as with

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

t: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 8:08 AMTo: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale  Have you seen https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/STXKQY_4.2.0/com.ibm.spectrum.scale.v4r2.adv.doc/bl

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

g main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> Date: 01/25/2018 11:53 AM Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org Jan Frode, thankyou for that link. I have a general question rega

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:39:52 -0500, Harold Morales said: > - site A simple three node cluster configured (AIX nodes). two failure > groups. two filesystems. No quota, no ILM. > - Site B the same cluster config as in site A configured (AIX nodes) same > hdisk device names used as in site A for

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

Hi, We are using a similar type of replication. I assume the site B is the cold site prepared for DR The storage layer is EMC VMAX and the LUNs are replicated with SRDF. All LUNs ( NSDs ) of the gpfs filesystem are in the same VMAX replication group to ensure consistency. The cluster name, IP

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

Have you seen https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/STXKQY_4.2.0/com.ibm.spectrum.scale.v4r2.adv.doc/bl1adv_dr.htm ? Seems to cover what you’re looking for.. -jf ons. 24. jan. 2018 kl. 07:33 skrev Harold Morales : > Thanks for answering. > > Essentially, the

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

Hi They are not even open for a routed L3 network? How they talk between DCs today then? I would really go L3 and AFM here if the sole purpose here is to have a DR -- Ystävällisin terveisin / Kind regards / Saludos cordiales / Salutations Luis Bolinches Consultant IT Specialist Mobile Phone:

[gpfsug-discuss] storage-based replication for Spectrum Scale

Hello, Is there any proven strategy to replicate disks from one local storage to one storage on another site and have this as a spectrum scale backup strategy. Let me explain: Context: - site A simple three node cluster configured (AIX nodes). two failure groups. two filesystems. No quota, no