When you write something like "mmbackup takes ages" - that let's us know
how you feel, kinda.
But we need some facts and data to make a determination if there is a real
problem and whether and how it might be improved.
Just to do a "back of the envelope" estimate of how long backup operations
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 07:52:38AM +0200, Dominic Mueller-Wicke01 wrote:
> Thanks for reading the paper. I agree that the restore of a large number of
> files is a challenge today. The restore is the focus area for future
> enhancements for the integration between IBM Spectrum Scale and IBM
>
ug 2016
16:24:59 -0700 -
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] *New* IBM Spectrum Protect Whitepaper "Petascale
08/31/2016 06:01 AMSubject:
Re: [gpfsug-discuss]
*New* IBM Spectrum Protect Whitepaper "Petascale Data Protection"Sent by:
gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.orgJust want to add on to one of the points
Sven touched on regarding metadata HW. We have a modest SSD infr
having solid metadata disks
(no pun intended) will really help with scan times.
From: Sven Oehme
Sent: 8/30/16, 7:25 PM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] *New* IBM Spectrum Protect Whitepaper "Petascale
Data Protection"
so lets start with some simple questions.
so lets start with some simple questions.
when you say mmbackup takes ages, what version of gpfs code are you running
?
how do you execute the mmbackup command ? exact parameters would be useful
.
what HW are you using for the metadata disks ?
how much capacity (df -h) and how many inodes (df -i)
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:20:46AM +0200, Frank Kraemer wrote:
> Find the paper here:
>
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home?lang=en#!/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager/page/Petascale%20Data%20Protection
thank you for the paper, I appreciate it.
However, I wonder
